Probably best to err on the side of caution. I don't mind the way it
works now, and I'd rather have that than an unpredictable bug that
takes frustrating hour upon hour to solve.
-Dan
On 5/11/06, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/05/2006, at 3:52 AM, Dan Eloff wrote:
> On 5/10
On 5/10/06, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Eloff wrote ..
> > This may turn out to be messy or not useful as is as well. Overall, I
> > guess what we need to come up with is some example use cases where
> > search paths are required and perhaps work from that as to what is
> > a
