Nick Coghlan wrote:
> As a location for this, I would actually suggest a module called something
> like "metatools",
-1, too vague and meaningless a name. If "decorator" is the
official term for this kind of function, then calling the
module "decorators" is precise and helpful. Other kinds of
me
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On 10/10/05, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 01:47, Calvin Spealman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Never created for a reason? lumping things together for having the
>>>similar usage semantics, but unrelated purposes, might be something to
>>>avoid and mayb
On 10/10/05, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 01:47, Calvin Spealman wrote:
>
> > Never created for a reason? lumping things together for having the
> > similar usage semantics, but unrelated purposes, might be something to
> > avoid and maybe that's why it hasn't hap
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 01:47, Calvin Spealman wrote:
> Never created for a reason? lumping things together for having the
> similar usage semantics, but unrelated purposes, might be something to
> avoid and maybe that's why it hasn't happened yet for decorators. If
> ever there was a makethreadsafe
Sorry, Nick. GMail, for some reason, doesn't follow the reply-to
properly for python-dev. Forwarding to list now...
On 10/9/05, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
> > Based on the discussion, I think I'd go with defaultproperty.
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > - Should this be
