On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Also, it would be useful to have a new method, float.is_integer(). This
>> would be better than the current approach where we make the
>> test: if x == floor(x).
>
> Ho
Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Also, it would be useful to have a new method, float.is_integer(). This
>> would be better than the current approach where we make the
>> test: if x == floor(x).
>>
>
> How common is this
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, it would be useful to have a new method, float.is_integer(). This
> would be better than the current approach where we make the
> test: if x == floor(x).
>
How common is this test? Given the inexact nature of
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Was some thought given to possibly adding these as
> float methods instead of as separate functions?
>
> float.isinf()
> float.isnan()
>
> Also, it would be useful to have a new method, float.is_integer(). This
> would be better than the current approach whe
Was some thought given to possibly adding these as
float methods instead of as separate functions?
float.isinf()
float.isnan()
Also, it would be useful to have a new method, float.is_integer(). This would
be better than the current approach where we make the
test: if x == floor(x).
