- Original Message -
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:18:31AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > Oh, I see. Some time ago, FPC has accepted a change that says, that
> > packages with "py" in name should be prefixed with "python-" anyway [1].
> > Since this only a
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:36:53PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Dne 4.12.2013 12:37, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
> >> > (tkinter is actually a subpackage of python itself)
> >>
> >> I guess you know wh
- Original Message -
> Dne 4.12.2013 12:37, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
> > (tkinter is actually a subpackage of python itself)
>
> I guess you know what I mean here, but to be clear:
>
> tkinter is only an example, we got more, like pyserial, PyYAML...
Oh, I see. Some time ago, FPC has a
Dne 4.12.2013 12:37, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
(tkinter is actually a subpackage of python itself)
I guess you know what I mean here, but to be clear:
tkinter is only an example, we got more, like pyserial, PyYAML...
Other thing:
What about apps? Do we want something in the guidelines that
- Original Message -
> What about package that doesn't have python- prefix?
>
> I saw that in the example:
>
> %if 0%{?with_python2}
> ...
> BuildRequires: tkinter
> %endif
>
> %if 0%{?with_python3}
> ...
> BuildRequires: python3-tkinter
What about package that doesn't have python- prefix?
I saw that in the example:
%if 0%{?with_python2}
...
BuildRequires: tkinter
%endif
%if 0%{?with_python3}
...
BuildRequires: python3-tkinter
%endif
So I guess tkinter i
