Hi all
I have read that one should not call dunder methods in application code.
Does the same apply to dunder variables? I am thinking of the instance
attribute __dict__, which allows access to the contents of the instance.
I only want to read from __dict__, not update it. Is this frowned upo
Hi, all.
Yesterday, I released msgpack-0.5, which was msgpack-python.
Both packages provide "msgpack" python package.
I used msgpack in early days, but easy_install crawling website
and download msgpack-1.0.0.tar.gz, which is msgpack for C instead
of Python package I upload to PyPI.
So I renamed
On Saturday, January 6, 2018 at 12:02:18 AM UTC, Rob Gaddi wrote:
> I'd like to create a native Python object that exposes the buffer
> protocol. Basically, something with a ._data member which is a
> bytearray that I can still readinto, make directly into a numpy array, etc.
>
> I can do it by
在 2005年7月16日星期六 UTC+8下午8:46:34，Benji York写道：
> googlegro...@garringer.net wrote:
> > How do I use Python to send keystrokes to a console window in Windows
> > XP?
>
> import win32com.client
>
> shell = win32com.client.Dispatch("WScript.Shell")
> shell.AppActivate("Command Prompt")
>
> shell.Send
On 01/05/2018 04:27 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Rob Gaddi writes:
I'd like to create a native Python object that exposes the buffer
protocol. Basically, something with a ._data member which is a
bytearray that I can still readinto, make directly into a numpy array,
etc.
The “etc.” seems pretty im
Dear Eli,
Can you please take a look at:
https://bitbucket.org/tkadm30/libuwsgictl/raw/048978bf2b51b1185302da98c5063978061293df/tests/cwrap/error
I'm playing around with cwrap: https://github.com/geggo/cwrap
Looks like this *gem* can generate Cython pxd files from C headers using
libclang. :
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Cody Piersall wrote:
>> Let's put it this way. Suppose that __eq__ existed and __ne__ didn't,
>> just like with __contains__. Go ahead: sell the notion of __ne__.
>> Pitch it, show why we absolutely need to allow this. Make sure you
>> mention the potential confusio
On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 15:55:00 +, user net wrote:
> Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer:
>> there is a language called python by guido
>>
>> you can ask your questions here !
>
>
>
> ✨🍰✨ python - a piece of cake ✨🍰✨
>
>
> when u read this post in thunderbird or torBrowser, you see colored
> emo
Op 08-01-18 om 17:25 schreef Cody Piersall:
>> Let's put it this way. Suppose that __eq__ existed and __ne__ didn't,
>> just like with __contains__. Go ahead: sell the notion of __ne__.
>> Pitch it, show why we absolutely need to allow this. Make sure you
>> mention the potential confusion when sub
On Monday, January 8, 2018 at 1:16:08 PM UTC, jorge@cptec.inpe.br wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please, I woudl like to plot a map like this figure. How can I do this
> using Python2.7
>
> Thanks,
>
> Conrado
Figures don't get through and you've all ready asked this question, possibly on
another forum
> Let's put it this way. Suppose that __eq__ existed and __ne__ didn't,
> just like with __contains__. Go ahead: sell the notion of __ne__.
> Pitch it, show why we absolutely need to allow this. Make sure you
> mention the potential confusion when subclassing. Be sure to show why
> it's okay for "n
there is a language called python by guido
you can ask your questions here !
On 5 Jan 2018 23:30, "Kim of K." wrote:
> OK now we have emoji in XPN
>
>
> but not in colour like in torBrowser...
>
>
> :-(
>
>
> 🙄
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
--
https://ma
Op 08-01-18 om 00:53 schreef Ethan Furman:
> On 01/07/2018 12:33 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> Actually, I think it is why it exists. If I recall correctly, the
> addition of the six comparative operators* was added at the behest of
> the scientific/numerical community.
Which personnaly, I think
Good points. Well, this is pretty academic at this point - I don't think
anyone would seriously choose to obsolete __ne__, regardless of whether it
is absolutely necessary or not.
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 2018-01-08 15:25, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
> > I don't see a
On 2018-01-08 15:25, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
> I don't see a case in IEEE where (x == y) != !(x != y).
> There _is_ a case where (x != x) is true (when x is NaN), but for such an
> x, (x == x) will be false.
>
> I am hard pressed to think of a case where __ne__ is actually useful.
See my earlier ema
Ugh, right, for NaN you can have (x < y) != (x >= y) - both would be false
if one of x and y is a NaN.
But __ne__ is still useless ;-)
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Thomas Nyberg wrote:
> On 01/08/2018 03:25 PM, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
> > I am hard pressed to think of a case where __ne__ is act
On 01/08/2018 03:25 PM, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
> I am hard pressed to think of a case where __ne__ is actually useful.
Assuming you're talking about a case specifically for IEEE 754, I'm
starting to agree. In general, however, it certainly is useful for some
numpy objects (as mentioned elsewhere in
I don't see a case in IEEE where (x == y) != !(x != y).
There _is_ a case where (x != x) is true (when x is NaN), but for such an
x, (x == x) will be false.
I am hard pressed to think of a case where __ne__ is actually useful.
That said, while it is true you only need one of (__eq__, __ne__), you
On 01/08/2018 12:36 PM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>
> Interesting sentence from that PEP:
>
> "3. The == and != operators are not assumed to be each other's
> complement (e.g. IEEE 754 floating point numbers do not satisfy this)."
>
> Does anybody here know how IEE 754 floating point numbers need __
fuel the troll ** poor py **
On 5 Jan 2018 20:30, "Kim of K." wrote:
>
> "Background
>
> We feel that the world still produces way too much software that is
> frankly substandard. The reasons for this are pretty simple: software
> producers do not pay enough attention [...]"
>
>
> quote from htt
Hi,
Please, I woudl like to plot a map like this figure. How can I do this
using Python2.7
Thanks,
Conrado
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2018-01-08 01:31, breamore...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 8, 2018 at 12:02:09 AM UTC, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> On 01/07/2018 12:33 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:13 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
On 07/01/18 20:55, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Under what circumstan
22 matches
Mail list logo
