On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:13:59 +0530, Prafull Ks wrote:
>
>> I miss studying in class 11 cbse.College as introduced us python. I
>> installed it in my laptop but when I save and runed in idle mod. The
>> 3.7.0 the 7 is highlighted and syntax
On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:13:59 +0530, Prafull Ks wrote:
> I miss studying in class 11 cbse.College as introduced us python. I
> installed it in my laptop but when I save and runed in idle mod. The
> 3.7.0 the 7 is highlighted and syntax error is showen. As showen in the
> screen shot below.
Unless
On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 13:02:35 -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> I'm guessing you may need some help in english writing too!
Now that's not fair. Not everyone is fluent in English and so long as
they make a genuine attempt we should be kind enough to ignore minor
spelling and grammatical errors.
On 08Jul2018 06:47, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2018-07-08 13:34, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 07Jul2018 21:57, Tim Chase wrote:
>On 2018-07-08 12:12, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>> On 07Jul2018 20:11, Skip Montanaro
>> wrote:
>> >> Have you looked at the ptx command? Might be called "gptx"
It's associated
Chris Angelico :
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 5:18 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Chris Angelico :
>>> Are you assuming that Python's semantics are defined by the semantics
>>> of one possible implementation language?
>>
>> What are Python's semantics defined by? I've been using these:
>>
>>https:/
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 5:18 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
>> Are you assuming that Python's semantics are defined by the semantics
>> of one possible implementation language?
>
> What are Python's semantics defined by? I've been using these:
>
>https://docs.python.org/3/referenc
Chris Angelico :
> Are you assuming that Python's semantics are defined by the semantics
> of one possible implementation language?
What are Python's semantics defined by? I've been using these:
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/>
https://docs.python.org/3/library/>
Unfortunately, neith
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> MRAB :
In C you'd declare 'quit' as 'volatile' to tell the compiler that it
could change unexpectedly, so don't make that assumption.
>>>
>>> C is an e
Chris Angelico :
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> MRAB :
>>> In C you'd declare 'quit' as 'volatile' to tell the compiler that it
>>> could change unexpectedly, so don't make that assumption.
>>
>> C is an even tougher case. Even if the compiler kept on checking a
>> vol
On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 16:37:11 +0100, MRAB wrote:
> On 2018-07-08 14:38, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 14:11:58 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>>> More importantly, this loop may never finish:
>>>
>>> # Initially
>>> quit = False
>>>
>>> # Thread 1
>>> gl
On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 19:35:55 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano :
>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 14:11:58 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> PS My example with "impossible" being the result of a racy integer
>>> operation is of course unlikely but could be the outcome if the Python
>>> runtime r
I'm guessing you may need some help in english writing too!
Anyways, I don't think anyone here may want to make your homeworks for
you...
Regards,
Etienne
Le 2018-07-08 à 12:43, Prafull Ks a écrit :
I miss studying in class 11 cbse.College as introduced us python. I
installed it in my lapto
screenshots are not sent in this list, can you please copy paste th error
or use paste bin?
thanks !
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I miss studying in class 11 cbse.College as introduced us python. I
installed it in my laptop but when I save and runed in idle mod. The 3.7.0
the 7 is highlighted and syntax error is showen. As showen in the screen
shot below.
Plz help me resolve this problem
Ur faithful user Prafull.
Thank you
--
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> MRAB :
>> On 2018-07-08 14:38, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 14:11:58 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>>
>> [snip]
More importantly, this loop may never finish:
# Initially
quit = False
Steven D'Aprano :
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 14:11:58 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> PS My example with "impossible" being the result of a racy integer
>> operation is of course unlikely but could be the outcome if the Python
>> runtime reorganized its object cache on the fly (in a hypothetical
>> impl
MRAB :
> On 2018-07-08 14:38, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 14:11:58 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>>> More importantly, this loop may never finish:
>>>
>>> # Initially
>>> quit = False
>>>
>>> # Thread 1
>>> global quit
>>> while not quit:
>>>
On 2018-07-08 14:38, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 14:11:58 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
[snip]
More importantly, this loop may never finish:
# Initially
quit = False
# Thread 1
global quit
while not quit:
time.sleep(1)
# Thread 2
global quit
On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 14:11:58 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano :
>> Changing implementations from one which is thread safe to one which is
>> not can break people's code, and shouldn't be done on a whim.
>> Especially since such breakage could be subtle, hard to notice, harder
>> to t
On Sunday, 8 July 2018 12:42:07 UTC+5:30, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 08.07.18 um 06:21 schrieb Sharan Basappa:
> > sorry. there was a copy paste error when i posted. I pasted test_2.py for
> > both the files:
> >
> > here are the files again. The issue remains.
>
> > output:
> > %run "D:/
On 2018-07-08 13:34, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 07Jul2018 21:57, Tim Chase wrote:
> >On 2018-07-08 12:12, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> >> On 07Jul2018 20:11, Skip Montanaro
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Have you looked at the ptx command? Might be called "gptx"
>
> It's associated with the troff stuff
Steven D'Aprano :
> Changing implementations from one which is thread safe to one which is
> not can break people's code, and shouldn't be done on a whim.
> Especially since such breakage could be subtle, hard to notice, harder
> to track down, and even harder still to fix.
Java's HotSpot does it
On Sun, 08 Jul 2018 10:52:15 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> You are on the right track, Chris, but you are still deducing behavior
> from a particular implementation. For example Java's definition is
> approximately the one I give above:
>
>Without correct synchronization, very strange, confu
non native speakers try to do their best
as for
...
who can't
be bothered to use correct grammar in English, and probably are
comparably sloppy in their code. ...
maybe but
check INADA NAOKI
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
or the practicality of killfiling people who
i appreciate every suggestions though ^^_
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Ahh, yes. The elegant purity of reading every email that goes through
> this mailing list, or the practicality of killfiling people who can't
> be bothered to use correct grammar in English, and p
Chris Angelico :
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>>> The only thing Python should guarantee is that the data structures stay
>>> "coherent" under race conditions. In other words, there cannot be a
>>> segmentation fault. For example, if two threads executed this code i
Am 08.07.18 um 06:21 schrieb Sharan Basappa:
sorry. there was a copy paste error when i posted. I pasted test_2.py for both
the files:
here are the files again. The issue remains.
output:
%run "D:/Projects/Initiatives/machine learning/programs/test_2_test.py"
30
Jim spotted it... '%run' i
On Sunday, 8 July 2018 11:52:39 UTC+5:30, Jim Lee wrote:
> On 07/07/18 21:21, Sharan Basappa wrote:
> >
> > sorry. there was a copy paste error when i posted. I pasted test_2.py for
> > both the files:
> >
> > here are the files again. The issue remains.
> > [...]
> >
> > output:
> > %run "D:/Pro
28 matches
Mail list logo
