>
> I currently do not see a nice way how to magically determine whether a
>> dot in a name means "hierarchy separator" or "it's just a dot".
>>
>
> And after an office discussion we suddenly see a way on the horizon how
> this can be fixed. Keep track of QBS-665 and QBS-666.
>
That's nice, I'll k
The limitation of not being able to use dots in project *names* (they do
currently work fine in targetNames) in Qbs is actually a big annoyance here
at my workplace.
We are developing a modular C++/Qml product that needs to be assembled
differently according to the needs of different projects we a