Adding Paolo and Eduardo since we're wandering into QOM-land.
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 08.08.2022 um 08:26 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 05:30:40PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>> >>
>> >> >
Am 08.08.2022 um 08:26 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 05:30:40PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> Daniel P. Berran
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 05:30:40PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Pet
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 05:30:40PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 27
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> >> >
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> >
>> > Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> > > An OTP device isn't really a parallel flash, and neither are eFuses.
>> > > Mo
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >
> > Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> > > An OTP device isn't really a parallel flash, and neither are eFuses.
> > > More fast-and-lose use of IF_PFLASH ma
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 15:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Kevin Wolf writes:
>> >
>> > But if you have more than one device, it becomes hard to predict which
>> > device gets which backend - it depends on the initialisation order in
>> > the code then,
>>
>> Really? Boa
Am 28.07.2022 um 16:50 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
> > Am 28.07.2022 um 11:46 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> >> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> >> > > An OTP device isn't rea
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 28.07.2022 um 11:46 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> >
>> > Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> > > An OTP device isn't really a parallel flash, and neither are eFuses.
>> > > More fast-and-lose
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 15:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Kevin Wolf writes:
> >
> > But if you have more than one device, it becomes hard to predict which
> > device gets which backend - it depends on the initialisation order in
> > the code then,
>
> Really? Board code should use IF_OTHER devic
On 7/28/22 15:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 28.07.2022 um 11:46 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
An OTP device isn't really a parallel flash, and neither are eFuses.
More fast-and-lose use of I
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 14:30, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Am 28.07.2022 um 11:46 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> > On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > If the existing types aren't good enough (I don't have an opinion on
> > > whether IF_PFLASH is a good match), let's add a new one. B
Am 28.07.2022 um 11:46 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >
> > Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> > > An OTP device isn't really a parallel flash, and neither are eFuses.
> > > More fast-and-lose use of IF_PFLASH may exist i
On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> > An OTP device isn't really a parallel flash, and neither are eFuses.
> > More fast-and-lose use of IF_PFLASH may exist in the tree, and maybe of
> > other interface types, too.
> >
> >
Am 18.07.2022 um 11:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Hao Wu writes:
>
> > This type is used to represent block devs that are not suitable to
> > be represented by other existing types.
> >
> > A sample use is to represent an at24c eeprom device defined in
> > hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c. The b
On 18/07/2022 11.49, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...]
An OTP device isn't really a parallel flash, and neither are eFuses.
More fast-and-lose use of IF_PFLASH may exist in the tree, and maybe of
other interface types, too.
This patch introduces IF_OTHER. The patch after next uses it for an
EEPROM
Hao Wu writes:
> This type is used to represent block devs that are not suitable to
> be represented by other existing types.
>
> A sample use is to represent an at24c eeprom device defined in
> hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c. The block device can be used to contain the
> content of the said eeprom devi
This type is used to represent block devs that are not suitable to
be represented by other existing types.
A sample use is to represent an at24c eeprom device defined in
hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c. The block device can be used to contain the
content of the said eeprom device.
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu
20 matches
Mail list logo