On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:32:55PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/2016 06:56 PM, John Snow wrote:
> >This is a follow-up to patches 1-6 of:
> >[PATCH v2 00/11] blockjobs: Fix transactional race condition
> >
> >That series started trying to refactor blockjobs with the goal of
> >internali
On 10/13/2016 06:56 PM, John Snow wrote:
This is a follow-up to patches 1-6 of:
[PATCH v2 00/11] blockjobs: Fix transactional race condition
That series started trying to refactor blockjobs with the goal of
internalizing BlockJob state as a side effect of having gone through
the effort of figu
This is a follow-up to patches 1-6 of:
[PATCH v2 00/11] blockjobs: Fix transactional race condition
That series started trying to refactor blockjobs with the goal of
internalizing BlockJob state as a side effect of having gone through
the effort of figuring out which commands were "safe" to call o
