Re: [PATCH v6 09/42] nvme: add max_ioqpairs device parameter

2020-03-31 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 07:40 +0200, Klaus Birkelund Jensen wrote: > On Mar 25 12:39, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 07:28 -0700, Klaus Jensen wrote: > > > From: Klaus Jensen > > > > > > The num_queues device paramater has a slightly confusing meaning because > > > it accounts for

Re: [PATCH v6 09/42] nvme: add max_ioqpairs device parameter

2020-03-30 Thread Klaus Birkelund Jensen
On Mar 25 12:39, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 07:28 -0700, Klaus Jensen wrote: > > From: Klaus Jensen > > > > The num_queues device paramater has a slightly confusing meaning because > > it accounts for the admin queue pair which is not really optional. > > Secondly, it is

Re: [PATCH v6 09/42] nvme: add max_ioqpairs device parameter

2020-03-25 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 07:28 -0700, Klaus Jensen wrote: > From: Klaus Jensen > > The num_queues device paramater has a slightly confusing meaning because > it accounts for the admin queue pair which is not really optional. > Secondly, it is really a maximum value of queues allowed. > > Add a new

[PATCH v6 09/42] nvme: add max_ioqpairs device parameter

2020-03-16 Thread Klaus Jensen
From: Klaus Jensen The num_queues device paramater has a slightly confusing meaning because it accounts for the admin queue pair which is not really optional. Secondly, it is really a maximum value of queues allowed. Add a new max_ioqpairs parameter that only accounts for I/O queue pairs, but