[Qemu-devel] State of TI OMAP board support?

Hello qemu-devel, I wonder, what's the state of TI OMAP patch, previously announced on the list by Andrzej Zaborowski http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-03/msg00125.html ? Is it considered for inclusion in the mainline? If not, what precludes that? -- Best regards, Paul

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] State of TI OMAP board support?

Hello Andrzej, Sunday, July 30, 2006, 4:29:41 PM, you wrote: > Hi, > On 30/07/06, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello qemu-devel, >> >> I wonder, what's the state of TI OMAP patch, previously announced on >> the list by Andrzej Zaboro

Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug of Qemu when running TAP device on Windows?

Hello Tieu,        Do you think that posting same long mail several times will get you more answers than careful reading of docs/some thought? ;-) Wednesday, August 9, 2006, 11:31:51 AM, you wrote: > Hi all, I ran successfully Qemu to simulate ARM system on Linux host with the followi

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] qemu dynamic translation (system design) question

Hello S.P.T.Krishnan, Sunday, August 20, 2006, 6:23:11 PM, you wrote: > Hi Laurent, > Thanks for the direction. > I am just thinking. If I run a guest OS once and observe the blocks > that are translated and may be reused. Then I again re-run the OS, > can I expect the same blocks are transla

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] Poor Qemu documentation for Windows host

Hello Alexey, Monday, September 18, 2006, 10:17:05 PM, you wrote: >> See also: >> http://www.h7.dion.ne.jp/~qemu-win/ (Documentation section below) > Thank you very much. > I have found something useful: TAP for Windows - that is - virtual > ethernet network driver for Win NT based systems. >

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] qemu & arm eabi (armel)

Hello Paul, Wednesday, September 27, 2006, 9:38:57 PM, you wrote: > On Wednesday 27 September 2006 19:27, K. Richard Pixley wrote: [] > Of course when using qemu the syscalls thatqemu emulates tend to be more > important than the host kernel version. By default qemu will report the same > vers

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] Config file support

Hello Paul, Monday, October 23, 2006, 11:29:52 PM, you wrote: > On Monday 23 October 2006 21:01, Rob Landley wrote: >> On Sunday 22 October 2006 2:27 pm, Paul Brook wrote: >> > I've been considering a machine config file for a while, but haven't come >> > up with a coherent way of representing ev

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] Config file support

Hello Paul, Tuesday, October 24, 2006, 3:36:40 AM, you wrote: > On Tuesday 24 October 2006 01:12, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >> Hello Paul, >> >> Monday, October 23, 2006, 11:29:52 PM, you wrote: >> > On Monday 23 October 2006 21:01, Rob Landley wrote: >> >&g

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] Config file support

Hello Rob, Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 2:28:47 AM, you wrote: > On Monday 23 October 2006 9:38 pm, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >> Maybe. But where are new chips in qemu? Why there're still only 2 >> ARM boards? How do I "stick" wi-fi card in one of them? So the conce

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] Config file support

Hello Paul, Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 6:01:48 PM, you wrote: >> Oh, c'mon, Rob! I really didn't want to ask Paul Brook that, but >> sure you'll fix my cluelessness right here, right now - tell me, tell me, >> why Linux has dynamic-loadable modules support, which clueless passers-by >> like m

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] Config file support

Hello Rob, Thursday, October 26, 2006, 5:31:46 PM, you wrote: > On Wednesday 25 October 2006 11:01 am, Paul Brook wrote: >> > Oh, c'mon, Rob! I really didn't want to ask Paul Brook that, but >> > sure you'll fix my cluelessness right here, right now - tell me, tell me, >> > why Linux has dynami

Re[2]: [Qemu-devel] Config file support

Hello Paul, Ummm, I must be representing my ideas somewhat unclear... ;-) Saturday, October 28, 2006, 3:08:20 AM, you wrote: [] >> Thanks for your response. But I hope none of us take the discussion >> too seriously to consider the arguments like above are all-convincing. >> They can b

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEmu as a Device Software Optimization tool

Hello Paul, Friday, July 27, 2007, 12:25:13 PM, you wrote: > The embedded space contains a vast number of boards, often only > different by what devices are use, where they are located, etc. > Building a new version of qemu for each board would be burdensome. > The hope would be that we c

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEmu as a Device Software Optimization tool

Hello, Andrzej Zaborowski wrote: > There is some interesting work being done on a similar project by Paul > Sokolovsky for his and Maria Zabolotnaya's Google Summer Of Project. Yes, there's such project, being done from Handhelds.org, with the motivation that the project

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vl.c vl.h hw/arm_boot.c

Hello Andrzej, Saturday, July 28, 2007, 1:08:46 AM, you wrote: > CVSROOT:/sources/qemu [] > Log message: > Optionally setup old style linux bootparams for -kernel, by Juergen > Lock. With such kind of options being merged, any chance that my old patch to override ARM

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Patches from PyQemu project

Hello Anthony, Monday, September 3, 2007, 11:44:13 PM, you wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 18:41 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: >> On 9/2/07, Maria Zabolotnaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > 2-qemu-mplugin.patch >> > Add -mplugin switch to allow loading of shared library and registering a >> > machine