Hello, my name is Sergio Gómez.
It seems that QEMU has been accepted into GSoC 2017. I'm interested in
working with QEMU due to my interest in virtual machines in general.
Particularly, taking into account that I have experience developing a
(simple) emulator, and a (very simple) operating system,
Hello,
Mr. Frank Yang was the guy at Google that introduced the HVF port to
Google's Android Emulator QEMU branch.
Frank, in this thread we are discussing the licensing issue with the HVF
files (their being GPL v2-only). Paolo from Red Hat was asking to Veertu
developer Izik Eidus if the code in Ve
4.iso -machine
>> q35,accel=hvf
>>
>> qemu-system-x86_64: -machine accel=hvf: No accelerator found
>>
>>
>> What am I doing wrong?
>>
>>
>> Try applying patch 3 too. Most of the early patches will end up squashed.
>>
>
> Yea that did
Just saw your last message. Will wait for Paolo's response.
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Sergio Andrés Gómez del Real <
sergio.g.delr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Izik, sorry for the late response. Tell me if you have any further issue.
> What are the 2 functions that could
This patchset didn't address every issue, so it won't be the definite
version.
Hopefully however the licensing issue will get fixed with this version.
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Sergio Andres Gomez Del Real <
sergio.g.delr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Changes in v3:
> (1) Fixe
Note that until this patch (8/14) there is no compiling. I tried to put
this patch earlier in the patchset but found difficulties because some
things need to be done before the hvf code compiles well.
Also, the commit message needs to be updated (remove the -enable-hvf part).
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 a
Stefan, is this acceptable? I mean delaying the compiling; up until patch 7
no hvf code is compiled. Or should I just squash everything from patch 2 to
7?
El 4/09/2017 23:03, "Sergio Andrés Gómez del Real" <
sergio.g.delr...@gmail.com> escribió:
Note that until this patch (8
Guys, I'm almost done with the new version of the patchset (hopefully the
definite one).
What I am missing essentially are presenting a few tests as suggested by
Stefan. Paolo and I only ran the eventinj test from the kvm suite. If I
modify this boot-serial-test to include hvf, should I send these
right.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Andrés Gómez Del Real
---
hw/dma/pl080.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/dma/pl080.c b/hw/dma/pl080.c
index 7724c93..8f34f24 100644
--- a/hw/dma/pl080.c
+++ b/hw/dma/pl080.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static uint64_t pl080_read(void *o
right.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Andrés Gómez Del Real
---
hw/dma/pl080.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/dma/pl080.c b/hw/dma/pl080.c
index 7724c93..3b0c20b 100644
--- a/hw/dma/pl080.c
+++ b/hw/dma/pl080.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static uint64_t pl080_read(void *o
10 matches
Mail list logo