The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
just switches on that same opcode without any actual common code.
Restore the opcode specific behavior without going back through another
level of switches.
On Sep 30 15:04, Keith Busch wrote:
> The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
> opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
> just switches on that same opcode without any actual common code.
> Restore the opcode specific behavior without g
On Oct 1 06:05, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Sep 30 15:04, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
> > opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
> > just switches on that same opcode without any actual common code.
> >
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:48:03AM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Oct 1 06:05, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > On Sep 30 15:04, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
> > > opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
> >
On Oct 1 06:05, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Sep 30 15:04, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that
> > opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that
> > just switches on that same opcode without any actual common code.
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Busch
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 6:04 PM
> To: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Klaus Jensen
>
> Cc: Niklas Cassel ; Dmitry Fomichev
> ; Kevin Wolf ; Philippe
> Mathieu-Daudé ; Keith Busch
> Subject