On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:28:31AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 2/5/21 5:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:07:08PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> The value '1.1k' is inexact; 1126.4 bytes is not possible, so we
> >> happen to truncate it to 1126. Our use of
On 2/5/21 5:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:07:08PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> The value '1.1k' is inexact; 1126.4 bytes is not possible, so we
>> happen to truncate it to 1126. Our use of fractional sizes is
>> intended for convenience, but when a user specifies a
On 2/5/21 4:34 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:07:08PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> The value '1.1k' is inexact; 1126.4 bytes is not possible, so we
>> happen to truncate it to 1126. Our use of fractional sizes is
>> intended for convenience, but when a user specifies a
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:07:08PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> The value '1.1k' is inexact; 1126.4 bytes is not possible, so we
> happen to truncate it to 1126. Our use of fractional sizes is
> intended for convenience, but when a user specifies a fraction that is
> not a clean translation to
04.02.2021 22:07, Eric Blake wrote:
The value '1.1k' is inexact; 1126.4 bytes is not possible, so we
happen to truncate it to 1126. Our use of fractional sizes is
intended for convenience, but when a user specifies a fraction that is
not a clean translation to binary, truncating/rounding behind
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:07:08PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> The value '1.1k' is inexact; 1126.4 bytes is not possible, so we
> happen to truncate it to 1126. Our use of fractional sizes is
> intended for convenience, but when a user specifies a fraction that is
> not a clean translation to
On 2/4/21 1:07 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> The value '1.1k' is inexact; 1126.4 bytes is not possible, so we
> happen to truncate it to 1126. Our use of fractional sizes is
> intended for convenience, but when a user specifies a fraction that is
> not a clean translation to binary, truncating/rounding
The value '1.1k' is inexact; 1126.4 bytes is not possible, so we
happen to truncate it to 1126. Our use of fractional sizes is
intended for convenience, but when a user specifies a fraction that is
not a clean translation to binary, truncating/rounding behind their
backs can cause confusion.