Gerd Hoffmann, le jeu. 11 mars 2021 12:37:38 +0100, a ecrit:
> Which would also drop support for serial braille devices. Not sure
> how much of a problem that would be these days.
It is an important concern: we also need to be able to test braille
devices connected through serial.
Samuel
Hi,
> > It is arguably the case for disk,
> > serial, net, and host, yet we removed those anyway, to make the regular
> > and more expressive interface the only one.
>
> The problem with those devices was that they used their own parameter
> parsing code,
Yes, that was IMHO the most important
On 11/03/21 09:38, Markus Armbruster wrote:
If we decide we want something else, keep -usbdevice braille deprecated
until something else is ready, then keep it deprecated for a sensible
grace period, then remove it. Flip-flopping deprecation in between is
not helpful.
If we can't make up our m
On 11/03/2021 09.38, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Thomas Huth writes:
When trying to remove the -usbdevice option, there were complaints that
"-usbdevice braille" is still a very useful shortcut for some people.
Thus we never remove this option. Since it's not such a big burden to
keep it around,
Thomas Huth writes:
> When trying to remove the -usbdevice option, there were complaints that
> "-usbdevice braille" is still a very useful shortcut for some people.
> Thus we never remove this option. Since it's not such a big burden to
> keep it around, and it's also convenient in the sense tha
When trying to remove the -usbdevice option, there were complaints that
"-usbdevice braille" is still a very useful shortcut for some people.
Thus we never remove this option. Since it's not such a big burden to
keep it around, and it's also convenient in the sense that you don't
have to worry to e