On 11/18/21 14:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 02:21:09PM +0200, Dov Murik wrote:
Pinging again -- Daniel said this should be added to 6.2.
Is there anything I should do?
I'm going to take care of sending a PULL to relieve Paolo's
workload.
Apologies, I ignored the
On 18/11/2021 15:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 02:21:09PM +0200, Dov Murik wrote:
>> Pinging again -- Daniel said this should be added to 6.2.
>>
>> Is there anything I should do?
>
> I'm going to take care of sending a PULL to relieve Paolo's
> workload.
>
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 02:21:09PM +0200, Dov Murik wrote:
> Pinging again -- Daniel said this should be added to 6.2.
>
> Is there anything I should do?
I'm going to take care of sending a PULL to relieve Paolo's
workload.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o-
Pinging again -- Daniel said this should be added to 6.2.
Is there anything I should do?
Thanks,
-Dov
On 14/11/2021 20:02, Dov Murik wrote:
> Paolo,
>
> Can you please add this series (already reviewed) to the fixes in 6.2?
>
> Thanks,
> -Dov
>
>
> On 11/11/2021 12:00, Dov Murik wrote:
>>
Paolo,
Can you please add this series (already reviewed) to the fixes in 6.2?
Thanks,
-Dov
On 11/11/2021 12:00, Dov Murik wrote:
> Tom Lendacky and Brijesh Singh reported two issues with launching SEV
> guests with the -kernel QEMU option when an old [1] or wrongly configured [2]
> OVMF images
Tom Lendacky and Brijesh Singh reported two issues with launching SEV
guests with the -kernel QEMU option when an old [1] or wrongly configured [2]
OVMF images are used.
To fix these issues, these series "hides" the whole kernel hashes
additions behind a kernel-hashes=on option (with default
