On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:54:34AM +, Hiroki Narukawa wrote:
> > Coroutine pool size was 64 from long ago, and the basis was organized in the
> > commit message in c740ad92.
>
> Sorry, I noticed that commit ID mentioning here was incorrect.
> The correct one is 4d68e86b.
>
> https://gitlab.co
> Coroutine pool size was 64 from long ago, and the basis was organized in the
> commit message in c740ad92.
Sorry, I noticed that commit ID mentioning here was incorrect.
The correct one is 4d68e86b.
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/4d68e86bb10159099da0798f74e7512955f15eec
I have r
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 05:36:16PM +0900, Hiroki Narukawa wrote:
> Coroutine pool size was 64 from long ago, and the basis was organized in the
> commit message in c740ad92.
>
> At that time, virtio-blk queue-size and num-queue were not configuable, and
> equivalent values were 128 and 1.
>
> C
Coroutine pool size was 64 from long ago, and the basis was organized in the
commit message in c740ad92.
At that time, virtio-blk queue-size and num-queue were not configuable, and
equivalent values were 128 and 1.
Coroutine pool size 64 was fine then.
Later queue-size and num-queue got config
