Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 19.03.2012 23:57, schrieb Juan Quintela:
>> Use one subsection for each feature. This means that we don't need to
>> bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced.
>>
>> Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure if I can "use"
>> uncached_cps
On 21 March 2012 16:29, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 19.03.2012 23:57, schrieb Juan Quintela:
>> Use one subsection for each feature. This means that we don't need to
>> bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced.
>>
>> Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure if I ca
Am 19.03.2012 23:57, schrieb Juan Quintela:
> Use one subsection for each feature. This means that we don't need to
> bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced.
>
> Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure if I can "use"
> uncached_cpsr for saving state.
>
> Signe
Use one subsection for each feature. This means that we don't need to
bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced.
Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure if I can "use"
uncached_cpsr for saving state.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
---
target-arm/cpu.h |5
