This patch provides support for the getfd_file monitor command.
This command will allow passing of a filename and its corresponding
file descriptor to a guest via the monitor. This command could be
followed, for example, by a drive_add command to hot attach a disk
drive.
Signed-off-by: Corey Brya
On 05/21/2012 02:19 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
> This patch provides support for the getfd_file monitor command.
> This command will allow passing of a filename and its corresponding
> file descriptor to a guest via the monitor. This command could be
> followed, for example, by a drive_add command to
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
I think Eric has raised the main questions about duplicating getfd and
rules regarding canonical file names (QEMU mashes filenames together
if the backing filename is relative!).
> + if (qemu_isdigit(filename[0])) {
> + qerror_report(
On 05/21/2012 05:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:19 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
This patch provides support for the getfd_file monitor command.
This command will allow passing of a filename and its corresponding
file descriptor to a guest via the monitor. This command could be
followed,
On 05/22/2012 05:18 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
I think Eric has raised the main questions about duplicating getfd and
rules regarding canonical file names (QEMU mashes filenames together
if the backing filename is relative!).
Ok, good so
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:18:22 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> QMP commands should be added to qapi-schema.json as described in
> docs/writing-qmp-commands.txt.
Looks like there's consensus on dropping this patch and enhancing getfd
to return the fd number. This would require to first convert getfd
On 05/22/2012 03:06 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:18:22 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
QMP commands should be added to qapi-schema.json as described in
docs/writing-qmp-commands.txt.
Looks like there's consensus on dropping this patch and enhancing getfd
to return the fd
On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:02:19 -0400
Corey Bryant wrote:
> > But there's a small problem. Today getfd commands are closely tied to the
> > Monitor. In Anthony's development tree, the getfd commands are tied to the
> > new QMP server's session support.
> >
> > Asking you to integrate the new QMP ser
On 05/22/2012 04:26 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:02:19 -0400
Corey Bryant wrote:
But there's a small problem. Today getfd commands are closely tied to the
Monitor. In Anthony's development tree, the getfd commands are tied to the
new QMP server's session support.
Asking
On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:34:19 -0400
Corey Bryant wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 04:26 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:02:19 -0400
> > Corey Bryant wrote:
> >
> >>> But there's a small problem. Today getfd commands are closely tied to the
> >>> Monitor. In Anthony's development tree,
On 05/23/2012 09:33 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:34:19 -0400
Corey Bryant wrote:
On 05/22/2012 04:26 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:02:19 -0400
Corey Bryant wrote:
But there's a small problem. Today getfd commands are closely tied to the
Monitor.
11 matches
Mail list logo
