Am 18.02.2011 13:55, schrieb Nick Thomas:
> This preserves the previous behaviour where the NBD server is
> unavailable or goes away during guest execution, but switches the
> NBD backend to present the AIO interface instead of the sync IO
> interface.
>
> We also split write requests into 1 MiB b
Hi again,
Thanks for looking through the patches. I'm just going through and
making the suggested changes now. I've also got qemu-nbd and block/nbd.c
working over IPv6 :) - hopefully I'll be able to provide patches in a
couple of days. Just a few questions about some of the changes...
Canceled re
Am 21.02.2011 17:31, schrieb Nicholas Thomas:
> Hi again,
>
> Thanks for looking through the patches. I'm just going through and
> making the suggested changes now. I've also got qemu-nbd and block/nbd.c
> working over IPv6 :) - hopefully I'll be able to provide patches in a
> couple of days. Just
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:55:29PM +, Nick Thomas wrote:
> +static inline AIOReq *alloc_aio_req(BDRVNBDState *s, NBDAIOCB *acb,
> +size_t data_len,
> +off_t offset,
> +off_t iov_offset)
>
> > + * Send I/O requests to the server.
> > + *
> > + * This function sends requests to the server, links the requests to
> > + * the outstanding_list in BDRVNBDState, and exits without waiting for
> > + * the response. The responses are received in the `aio_read_response'
> > + * function which
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
>
>> > + * Send I/O requests to the server.
>> > + *
>> > + * This function sends requests to the server, links the requests to
>> > + * the outstanding_list in BDRVNBDState, and exits without waiting for
>> > + * the response. The response
At Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:48:49 +0100,
Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Am 21.02.2011 17:31, schrieb Nicholas Thomas:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > Thanks for looking through the patches. I'm just going through and
> > making the suggested changes now. I've also got qemu-nbd and block/nbd.c
> > working over IPv6 :) -
