On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:23:43AM +0800, TeLeMan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:58, Stefan Weil wrote:
> > Is patch 4 (call handling) needed, or is it an optimization?
> > If it is needed, the tcg disassembler has to be extended as well.
>
> In fact tci has no stack and robber registers and
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:58, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Is patch 4 (call handling) needed, or is it an optimization?
> If it is needed, the tcg disassembler has to be extended as well.
In fact tci has no stack and robber registers and doesn't need
simulate the CPU work. I am trying to remove tcg_reg_a
TeLeMan schrieb:
> Tested i386-softmmu only. Now tci can run windows xp sp2 and its speed
> is about 6 times slower than jit.
> --
> SUN OF A BEACH
Great. Many thanks for the fixes, enhancements and for the testing, too.
Is patch 4 (call handling) needed, or is it an optimization?
If it is needed
