Bill Cable wrote:
> I would also be willing to chip in some $$ also and it could possibly
> work in one of 2 ways. Either buy the rights to put SMSQ/E under the GPL
> or pay Peter to release his work under GPL for QDOS Classic or Minerva.
This looks like a fundamental misunderstanding. I do not
Hi,
a short visit to this list, since I've been asked for a comment on a
similar subject.
As some of you know, I'm working on a software that has the realistic
potential to provide
- Native ethernet for Q40/Q60
- Driver for Nasta's unfinished ethernet extension (QL/GC/SGC...)
- Native connectiv
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
>
> Jerome Grimbert wrote:
> > Oh, excuse-me, but I'm only using (and developping it too) on Q40.
> > I won't call that a waste!
>
> Of course not. It's not Jochen who actually suggested that NO Qx0 user
> uses the new SMSQ/E. If that was the case, we could really have save
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> Well, Peter sells hardware, of course he wouldn't mind the software
> being totally free.
I never asked for SMSQ/E to be free of charge for me, or to indirectly
reduce overall Q60 costs, as you seem to allude. As a matter of fact, I
had offered compensation for Tony Tebb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >This "lack of common ground" seems to stem from the fact that you prefer
> > >to profit from
> > >developments made for other systems (eg. Marcel's new wman etc) and not
> > >chip in
> > >anything of your own.
> >
> > I never used any version of SMSQ/E after those
