Re: General mail/dial-up question

1999-05-16 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:20:58AM -0500, Wade wrote: > Duh... That's what I started out thinking, and I let someone convince me > that 25 was bi-directional and handled both on a LAN. Excuse me while I go > Snipe hunting. :) > > > -Original Message- > > From: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EM

RE: General mail/dial-up question

1999-05-12 Thread Wade
Duh... That's what I started out thinking, and I let someone convince me that 25 was bi-directional and handled both on a LAN. Excuse me while I go Snipe hunting. :) > -Original Message- > From: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > The users connect thru the dial-up server (whic

Re: General mail/dial-up question

1999-05-12 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 09:38:18AM -0500, Wade wrote: > My very fuzzy understanding of how this works: Windoze connects to the > dial-up server and uses the dial-up server's port 25 to connect to the qmail > server's port 25 to send/receive mail. Is that it, or am I missing the big > picture - a

General mail/dial-up question

1999-05-12 Thread Wade
I know this isn't qmail specific and I apologize, but I know a LOT of people on this list will know the answer. I have looked through several RFCs (probably the wrong ones!) and still can't find a definite confirmation of how I think this works. (Can anyone recommend a good overview of the email