[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>-- Forwarded message --
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:40:06 AST
>Subject: tcpserver SESSIONLIMIT (fwd)
>
>
> hello peter
>
>
> no i am certainly not talking about -c it stands for count
>no
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:40:06 AST
Subject: tcpserver SESSIONLIMIT (fwd)
hello peter
no i am certainly not talking about -c it stands for count
not for SESSIONLIMIT , i am trying to limit simultanious SMTP
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:40:06 AST
Subject: tcpserver SESSIONLIMIT (fwd)
hello peter
no i am certainly not talking about -c it stands for count
not for SESSIONLIMIT , i am trying to limit simultanious SMTP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> no i am certainly not talking about -c it stands for count
>not for SESSIONLIMIT , i am trying to limit simultanious SMTP connections
>from single IP address and found some scripts written by anad ,
You should have mentioned that when you asked the question.
>bu
hello peter
no i am certainly not talking about -c it stands for count
not for SESSIONLIMIT , i am trying to limit simultanious SMTP connections
from single IP address and found some scripts written by anad , but author
of that script suggest that MAX limit count must be specified by
t