Re: [ntp:questions] PPS versus serial offset

2013-08-29 Thread David Taylor
On 28/08/2013 13:19, Steve Kostecke wrote: On 2013-08-28, David Taylor wrote: detha wrote: http://detha.co.za/ntp/ntpmon.20130828.jpg I would be more worried about the 11 ms step in the PPS at about -155 hours... The PPS signal is plotted in green and does not diverge visibly from 0. T

Re: [ntp:questions] Start of new GPS 1024 week epoch

2013-08-29 Thread David Taylor
On 28/08/2013 13:34, Rob wrote: [] No, I mean when compiling ntpd for Windows. I think that requires Cygwin. Not so, it compiles purely with the free MS Visual Studio Express (C++ branch). It does need the OpenSSL source installed as well, but that also works with MS VS. No Cygwin needed a

Re: [ntp:questions] Start of new GPS 1024 week epoch

2013-08-29 Thread Rob
David Taylor wrote: > On 28/08/2013 13:34, Rob wrote: > [] >> No, I mean when compiling ntpd for Windows. I think that requires Cygwin. > > Not so, it compiles purely with the free MS Visual Studio Express (C++ > branch). It does need the OpenSSL source installed as well, but that > also works

Re: [ntp:questions] Start of new GPS 1024 week epoch

2013-08-29 Thread David Taylor
On 29/08/2013 08:21, Rob wrote: [] Sorry... mistake. I mean when compiling *gpsd* for Windows. Looking at the source, gpsd does not have special code for Windows SHM. It could work, when it is compiled with Cygwin. Ah, OK, but I think gpsd for Windows would get a much better reception were i

Re: [ntp:questions] Start of new GPS 1024 week epoch

2013-08-29 Thread John Hasler
David Taylor writes: > Ah, OK, but I think gpsd for Windows would get a much better reception > were it not to require Cygwin to run i.e, just like ntp, use only the > standard Windows calls. From : "No, we don't support Windows — get a better operating system." esr i

Re: [ntp:questions] Start of new GPS 1024 week epoch

2013-08-29 Thread unruh
On 2013-08-29, John Hasler wrote: > David Taylor writes: >> Ah, OK, but I think gpsd for Windows would get a much better reception >> were it not to require Cygwin to run i.e, just like ntp, use only the >> standard Windows calls. > > From : > "No, we don't support Win

[ntp:questions] NTPD silently not tracking

2013-08-29 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi, We had another incident where a node configured with multiple NTP sources had an NTPD which when asked with ntpdc have peers, looks like things are all OK, but with offsets less than a second, while the node in fact was 6 days off the mark. Only on a number of ntpdc querries did some of the pe

Re: [ntp:questions] NTPD silently not tracking

2013-08-29 Thread E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Magnus Danielson wrote: > We had another incident where a node configured with multiple NTP > sources had an NTPD which when asked with ntpdc have peers, looks like > things are all OK, but with offsets less than a second, while the node > in fact was 6 days off the mark. Only on a number of ntpdc

Re: [ntp:questions] NTPD silently not tracking

2013-08-29 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 08/30/2013 04:17 AM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists wrote: > Magnus Danielson wrote: >> We had another incident where a node configured with multiple NTP >> sources had an NTPD which when asked with ntpdc have peers, looks like >> things are all OK, but with offsets