On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Jaap Winius wrote:
> Has anyone here managed to turn a relatively cheap, ARM-based embedded
> system with a serial port into a decent stratum 1 NTP server?
Yes (Google NTP Beaglebone or NTP Raspberry Pi I have both) although
since that almost certainly means GPS de
Harlan,
On 07/06/2014 02:18 AM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Magnus,
Yes, we know that if we decide to track finely-grained behavior we'll
need to watch how {IP,port} responds when getting {no,KOD} responses.
Just want to gently remind you.
We might just want a syslog entry for KOD, because it's cle
Magnus,
Yes, we know that if we decide to track finely-grained behavior we'll
need to watch how {IP,port} responds when getting {no,KOD} responses.
We might just want a syslog entry for KOD, because it's clear that there
can come a time when we don't want to rely on the remote side doing
anything
Hi folks,
Has anyone here managed to turn a relatively cheap, ARM-based embedded
system with a serial port into a decent stratum 1 NTP server?
Thus far I've always attached my GPS and radio time signal receivers to
much larger x86 hardware platforms, but those machines have other things
to do
Harlan,
On 07/05/2014 11:40 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Folks,
I was chatting with PHK about:
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/NtpProtocolResponseMatrix
http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2367
and how we probably want to extend KOD coverage to more than just the
"limited" case.
I was as
Folks,
I was chatting with PHK about:
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/NtpProtocolResponseMatrix
http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2367
and how we probably want to extend KOD coverage to more than just the
"limited" case.
I was assuming folks would want finer-grained control over this
b
On 28/06/2014 16:52, David Taylor wrote:
Could anyone please explain why I have been blocked from following the
tweets of @NTP?
Well, I don't know if someone did something, but it appears to be OK
now. Thanks!
--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
__