Ah, you are correct, my bad and apologies. I forgot that table is only for
available methods, not for available generics.
KK.
> On Apr 30, 2023, at 4:49 PM, Kurt Hornik wrote:
>
>> Karolis Koncevičius writes:
>
>> But this might require a more detailed investigation. For example I
>> just
> Karolis Koncevičius writes:
> But this might require a more detailed investigation. For example I
> just noticed that even with the patch `@` is still not listed in
> .S3_methods_table().
Afaict base does not register any methods for @ or @<- ?
-k
> KK.
>> On Apr 29, 2023, at 4:44 PM, Ka
But this might require a more detailed investigation. For example I just
noticed that even with the patch `@` is still not listed in .S3_methods_table().
KK.
> On Apr 29, 2023, at 4:44 PM, Karolis Koncevičius
> wrote:
>
> Hello Kurt,
>
> With r84341 it now works on my side.
>
> Warm regards
On 4/30/23 06:05, Michael Milton wrote:
> Hi Tomas, thanks for the reply.
>
> I played with some of the factors you mentioned like allocating more
> INTSXP of the same size as vec_1, to little success. The thing that
> actually "worked" and caused a segfault, was simply allocating a
> larger v
