On 6/2/2005 1:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoops, spoke too soon. This definitely breaks the logic, so I won't
commit. With this change the check of demo(lm.glm) in package utils
fails with this error message:
dead - cbind(x, n - x)
I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the
function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152 looks like a typo:
here are lines 149-155
if(!*fun) {
if(dll.type != FILENAME) {
*fun = R_FindNativeSymbolFromDLL(buf, dll, symbol);
: Thursday, June 02, 2005 12:33 PM
To: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: [Rd] dotcode typo?
I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the
function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152 looks like a typo:
here are lines 149-155
if(!*fun) {
if(dll.type
Of Huntsinger, Reid
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 12:33 PM
To: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: [Rd] dotcode typo?
I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the
function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152 looks like a typo:
here are lines 149-155
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huntsinger, Reid
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 12:33 PM
To: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: [Rd] dotcode typo?
I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the
function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152 looks like a typo:
here
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huntsinger, Reid
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 12:33 PM
To: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: [Rd] dotcode typo?
I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the
function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152
