You can at least get rid of the
for (i in 1:200){
y[i]<-rbinom(1,1,0.8)
x1[i]<-ifelse(y[i]==1,rnorm(1,mean=20, sd=2),rnorm(1,mean=16, sd=2.2))
loop with the following
y <- rbinom(200, 1, 0.8)
y.1 <- y == 1 # get logical vector of y == 1
x1 <- numeric(200) # allocate the vector
x1[y.1] <-
Hi,
I'm trying to do a double for loop like this:
for (k in 1:1000){
for (i in 1:200){
y[i]<-rbinom(1,1,0.8)
x1[i]<-ifelse(y[i]==1,rnorm(1,mean=20, sd=2),rnorm(1,mean=16, sd=2.2))
}
for (j in 1:300){
}
}
Does anyone know a good reference about double loops?
Thank you,
Sigalit
[[a
On 25 Jun 2008, at 19:45, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Try this:
plot(1, xlab = ~ alpha / V * m^-3 * kg ^-2 * l^4)
Thanks, I would never have expected this code to work, this is a
mystery to me! Actually, I thought xlab wanted an expression, but it
seems to be happy with a formula. Also,
Hi all,
I have a simple question and couldn't find any post on this. When
plotting simple scatterplots (other plots as well), e.g.,
x<-rnorm(30, 10, 1)
y<-rnorm(30, 10, 1)
plot(x, y, pch = 15, cex = 1),
the points, even those close to each other, may have visibly different
sizes. Do you know wha
Package "bigmemory" is now available on CRAN. A brief abstract follows:
Multi-gigabyte data sets challenge and frustrate R users even on
well-equipped hardware.
C/C++ and Fortran programming can be helpful, but is cumbersome for interactive
data analysis and lacks the flexibility and power of R's
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo