On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Felipe Carrillo
wrote:
> strange,,I don't see any change either, could it be that we have an older
> version of zoo?
>
I am using the most recent one on CRAN which is zoo 1.6.4:
> packageDescription("zoo")$Version
[1] "1.6-4"
--
Statistics & Software Consulting
Edgecombe
> Cc: r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 10:51:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [R] Filling in missing time samples with na.approx
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jason Edgecombe
> wrote:
> > On 11/29/2010 10:00 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
&g
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jason Edgecombe
wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 10:00 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Jason Edgecombe
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I have a some data from a sports gps device like the following:
>>>
>>> time latitud
On 11/29/2010 10:00 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Jason Edgecombe
wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have a some data from a sports gps device like the following:
time latitude longitude altitude distance heartrate
1 1277648884 0.304048 -0.793819 260 0.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Jason Edgecombe
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have a some data from a sports gps device like the following:
>
> time latitude longitude altitude distance heartrate
> 1 1277648884 0.304048 -0.793819 260 0.00 94
> 2 1277648885 0.304056 -0.79377
Hi Everyone,
I have a some data from a sports gps device like the following:
time latitude longitude altitude distance heartrate
1 1277648884 0.304048 -0.793819 260 0.0094
2 1277648885 0.304056 -0.793772 262 4.30761595
3 127764 0.304060 -0.793696
6 matches
Mail list logo