Re: [R] subject: Log likelihood above 0

2010-10-05 Thread Ravi Varadhan
Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology School of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Ph. (410) 502-2619 email: rvarad...@jhmi.edu - Original Message - From: peter dalgaard Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2010 9:49 am Subject: Re: [R] subject: Log likelihood above 0 To: Ravi Varadhan Cc: Daniel

Re: [R] subject: Log likelihood above 0

2010-10-05 Thread peter dalgaard
opkins University > > Ph. (410) 502-2619 > email: rvarad...@jhmi.edu > > > - Original Message - > From: Daniel Haugstvedt > Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2010 9:16 am > Subject: [R] subject: Log likelihood above 0 > To: r-help@r-project.org > > >> Hi -

Re: [R] subject: Log likelihood above 0

2010-10-05 Thread Ravi Varadhan
- Original Message - From: Daniel Haugstvedt Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2010 9:16 am Subject: [R] subject: Log likelihood above 0 To: r-help@r-project.org > Hi - > > In an effort to learn some basic arima modeling in R i went through > the tutorial found at > &g

[R] subject: Log likelihood above 0

2010-10-05 Thread Daniel Haugstvedt
Hi - In an effort to learn some basic arima modeling in R i went through the tutorial found at http://www.stat.pitt.edu/stoffer/tsa2/R_time_series_quick_fix.htm One of the examples gave me a log likelihood of 77. Now I am simply wondering if this is the expected behavior? Looking in my text book