[racket-users] Re: Mono, racketscript, ffi, databases and pointer swizzling

2019-02-06 Thread amz3
On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 3:38:30 PM UTC+1, Greg Trzeciak wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 9:30:43 AM UTC+1, amz3 wrote > >> I tried to engage with racket community about what was missing in racket >> to build "industry grade web application". I got only silence in reply

[racket-users] Re: Mono, racketscript, ffi, databases and pointer swizzling

2019-02-06 Thread Greg Trzeciak
On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 9:30:43 AM UTC+1, amz3 wrote > I tried to engage with racket community about what was missing in racket > to build "industry grade web application". I got only silence in reply :( > > AFAIK one missing piece is something like Python Celery. That can be > repla

[racket-users] Re: Mono, racketscript, ffi, databases and pointer swizzling

2019-02-06 Thread amz3
On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 1:25:03 PM UTC+2, Greg Trzeciak wrote: > > On Monday, July 24, 2017 at 11:01:33 PM UTC+2, amz3 wrote: > > > > > That said, I am not sure it can scale as much as I want/need given > racket thread model [5]. I will experiment. > > > > [5] > http://docs.racket-l

[racket-users] Re: Mono, racketscript, ffi, databases and pointer swizzling

2017-08-01 Thread Greg Trzeciak
On Monday, July 24, 2017 at 11:01:33 PM UTC+2, amz3 wrote: > By the way, do you recommend binding wiredtiger using typed racket? > > [3] they are other solution in racket. > [4] http://hyperdev.fr/projects/wiredtiger/ > > That said, I am not sure it can scale as much as I want/need given racket