Definitely interested in seeing some pics!
-Original Message-
From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of George Mastoras
Sent: Tuesday, 18 May 2010 8:24 PM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
Hey all, long
ut through it.
>>>>> A 'la it WILL slip if you put more torque through than it can handle.
>>>>> Having
>>>>> said that, there is friction there which is what is stopping it from
>>>>> slipping, while this geared approach has (basically) no fri
ping it from
>>>> slipping, while this geared approach has (basically) no friction. Think of
>>>> it like the gears of a manual gearbox, with the variability of a CVT.
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Mes
---Original Message-
>>> From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
>>> [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Clark Ward Jr
>>> Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 9:26 PM
>>> To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
>>
In a message dated 5/16/2010 11:39:16 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
billw...@gmail.com writes:
A cone-and-belt cvt works like the pulley stacks in a drill press
drive. Only, instead of two sets of pulleys, you have two cones and a
mechanism to keep the belt taut on those cones. Move th
s.com
[mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Clark Ward Jr
Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 9:26 PM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
Aren't CVTs less efficient than geared transmissions, given that
they are slipping the whole time? Or do I misund
legroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Clark Ward Jr
> Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 9:26 PM
> To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
>
> Aren't CVTs less efficient than geared transmissions, given that they are
> slipping the whole time? Or do I misund
nk of it like the gears of
a manual gearbox, with the variability of a CVT.
Ben
-Original Message-
From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Clark Ward Jr
Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 9:26 PM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [
Aren't CVTs less efficient than geared transmissions, given that they
are slipping the whole time? Or do I misunderstand the technology
vis-a-vis the slipping belt and the cones of a CVT?
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Don Shankin wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Ben Holko wrote
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Ben Holko wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6zE__J0YIU
>
>
>
> This thing may revolutionize all transmissions.
>
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
> To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
> To un
10 matches
Mail list logo
