Still, I fail to see how a national list is less effective than a local
list. Local lists are fine for local discussions, but cannot take the
place of a national list. Maybe SCAROA should host a RB list, too???
BTW, the having gone to a website comment and URL you made AFTER I
asked the
Threaded...
Spencer R. Peterson wrote:
You have misread and misunderstood his comments. He attempted to direct
comments to a more appropriate forum.
That's what I was doing - trying to move the discussion from the RB list
to the RB Coordination list.
Yes, I understand that he was trying to
Sounds like you want it buried on a local list. That's fine. I would
like to see what's going on, but I'm not going to join 75 local lists to
keep tabs on the various areas. That's the reason for having a national
list.
My only insistence was that it move from the RB list to the RBC list as
THIS ENTIRE THREAD IS OUT OF LINE AND AGAINST LIST RULES!!
Per Kevin and my wishes, this topic is now closed. Any further
discussion by ANY parties will lead to people being banned from this
list. Understood??
Scott N3XCC - List co-owner
Scott Zimmerman
Amateur Radio Call N3XCC
474 Barnett
At 5/8/2009 14:35, you wrote:
Mr. Dengler still has not answered why he made the self-serving statement
that TASMA doesn't have a 70cm plan when they have a motion before them to
adopt the SCRRBA plan.
TASMA currently does not have a 70 cm bandplan. There are proposals within
TASMA being
raffertysec wrote:
It strikes me as very odd that you insist on keeping this on a Yahoo Group
that is nationwide instead of allowing the locals to go to a neutral place..
You don't make a dime off of the advertising here, so what does it matter? I
referenced SCAROA two by URL oprior to
I'm sorry, can SOMEone please tell me how this thread related to building
repeaters?
73 de N4SHD
From: Ed Yoho w6yj_ya...@67hz.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 6:17:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: TASMA 70 cm
: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: TASMA 70 cm band coordination
I'm sorry, can SOMEone please tell me how this thread related to building
repeaters?
73 de N4SHD
--
From: Ed Yoho w6yj_ya...@67hz.net
Repeaters need functional band coordination.
-- Original Message --
Received: Fri, 08 May 2009 07:52:59 PM PDT
From: Dean Nash n4...@yahoo.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: TASMA 70 cm band coordination
I'm sorry, can SOMEone please tell me
The list owner created
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder-Coordination/ for
coordination issues related to building repeaters. This was done
specifically to keep coordination issues off *this* list.
Joe M.
raffertysec wrote:
I will also disagree in that building a repeater
The list is a subset of this list, and again, was created to keep
coordination discussions off this list. What is SCAROA anyway?
Joe M.
raffertysec wrote:
Why duplicate the efforts? SCAROA has long existed.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, MCH m...@... wrote:
The list owner created
Before this gets out of hand, allow me to state that my post mentioning
TASMA in conflict with SCRRBA was in error, and I posted a retraction. The
potential conflict is between SCRRBA and NARCC; TASMA is not a party to the
low in/high out versus high in/low out issue on 70cm band plans. At
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 6:12 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: TASMA 70 cm band coordination
Before this gets out of hand, allow me to state that my post
At 5/4/2009 17:46, you wrote:
This could get real interesting, real fast, since the big difference between
SCRRBA and TASMA band plans is whether the 70cm repeater inputs should be
above or below the outputs. They are opposite polarities!
73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
TASMA has a 70 cm bandplan?
14 matches
Mail list logo
