Re: [Repoze-dev] Problems with repoze.sphinx.autointerface

2009-07-08 Thread Thomas Lotze
Tres Seaver wrote: > I just released version 0.2, whicn now requires Sphinx >= 0.6.1. Wow, that was fast. Thank you very much. -- Thomas ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Re: [Repoze-dev] Problems with repoze.sphinx.autointerface

2009-07-08 Thread Thomas Lotze
Tres Seaver wrote: > I haven't had a chance to look at it, and likely won't have for a bit. I > would be glad to apply a patch and release a new version, if that would > help. Actually, the immediate reason for the registration of the directive to break seems to have been fixed on the trunk back

Re: [Repoze-dev] Problems with repoze.sphinx.autointerface

2009-07-08 Thread Thomas Lotze
Tres Seaver wrote: > I haven't had a chance to look at it, and likely won't have for a bit. I > would be glad to apply a patch and release a new version, if that would > help. OK, I'll try to come up with one. -- Thomas ___ Repoze-dev mailing list

Re: [Repoze-dev] Problems with repoze.sphinx.autointerface

2009-07-07 Thread Thomas Lotze
Alec Munro wrote: > Seems this depends on docutils 0.5, as when used with docutils 0.4, it > tries to import Directive from docutils.parsers.rst. Which isn't there. > > Upon updating docutils, it seems like it may not like sphinx 0.6.1. On > line 112, it calls: > > app.add_directive('autoint