Re: [Resin-interest] Leak with 3.0.23 load balancing

477 of those threads had this stack: 0xff2c5870 _read + 0x8 0xe91db008 sock_read + 0x24 0xe91d8edc BIO_read + 0xcc 0xeaa49154 ssl3_read_n + 0x154 0xeaa492d0 ssl3_get_record + 0xe0 0xeaa49e78 ssl3_read_bytes + 0x1fc 0xeaa48dcc ssl3_read_internal + 0x44 0xeacb22a4

Re: [Resin-interest] Resin 3.0 thread leak

On Oct 2, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Tom Hintz wrote: Out of curiosity, is it safe to set the thread stack size to 1k on the load balance resin? That's almost certainly too low. 256k is probably the minimum you could get away with. That parameter is virtual memory, so it's only actually takes up

Re: [Resin-interest] Leak with 3.0.23 load balancing

On Oct 3, 2008, at 7:03 AM, Tom Hintz wrote: 477 of those threads had this stack: 0xff2c5870 _read + 0x8 0xe91db008 sock_read + 0x24 0xe91d8edc BIO_read + 0xcc 0xeaa49154 ssl3_read_n + 0x154 0xeaa492d0 ssl3_get_record + 0xe0 0xeaa49e78 ssl3_read_bytes +