>If a member of a backup set is marked missing, does Retrospect treat what
>was on the tape as having not been backed up?
Yes.
>For example, if one
>computer's whole hard disk is copied for the first time on a tape and
>that tape is marked missing, does Retrospect start from scratch
>the next ti
At 08.01 -0700 00-06-12, Glenn L. Austin wrote/00-06-12, 08.01 -0700
skrev Glenn L. Austin:
>Just because it is called "sleep" in the ESCP, doesn't mean that it really
>is sleep. My Windows laptop uses "Suspend" to mean "save memory and power
>down." The easiest way to tell if it is truly slee
I don't know the answer to this question, but your subject line could be
the setup for an almost infinite number of jokes. Perhaps we can swap
them at MacWorld...
Maurice Volaski wrote:
>
> If a member of a backup set is marked missing, does Retrospect treat
> what was on the tape as having not
If a member of a backup set is marked missing, does Retrospect treat
what was on the tape as having not been backed up? For example, if
one computer's whole hard disk is copied for the first time on a tape
and that tape is marked missing, does Retrospect start from scratch
the next time around
In the listing of backup set members, Retrospect gives the space
taken up on tape. Is this value represent the total of the raw data
or the total of compressed data? I am seeing about 45 GB on the 230
meter AIT-2 tapes and presume this a compressed value, that the raw
data is somewhat higher t