Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#issuecomment-137354051
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#issuecomment-137353992
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8553#discussion_r38617544
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/CatalystReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -32,31 +32,56 @@ import org.apache.sp
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#issuecomment-137352784
Looks good, thanks for fixing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#discussion_r38617290
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/AccumulableInfo.scala ---
@@ -34,9 +34,15 @@ class AccumulableInfo private[spark] (
overrid
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#issuecomment-137352727
[Test build #41961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41961/consoleFull)
for PR 8581 at commit
[`25c0f7b`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#discussion_r38617239
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDOperationScopeSuite.scala ---
@@ -38,6 +38,13 @@ class RDDOperationScopeSuite extends SparkFunSuite w
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#issuecomment-137352426
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#issuecomment-137352433
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#issuecomment-137352088
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-137350715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-137350711
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-137350369
[Test build #41958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41958/console)
for PR 8383 at commit
[`62cc7e3`](https://github.
Github user romansew closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8482
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user romansew commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8482#issuecomment-137344930
I open the other one:https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8562
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581#issuecomment-137335470
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user vinodkc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8581
[SPARK-10430][SPARK-10430]Added hashCode methods in AccumulableInfo and
RDDOperationScope
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vinod
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3543#issuecomment-137335223
OK, makes sense. Can you close this PR for now then? If there's interest we
can always reopen it against the latest master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8570
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8570#issuecomment-137334438
LGTM merging into master 1.5 thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8543
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8434
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8514
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8543#issuecomment-137334210
Merged into master, thanks @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8434#issuecomment-137333753
Merged into master, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7927#issuecomment-137333723
[Test build #41960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41960/consoleFull)
for PR 7927 at commit
[`6c6d53d`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8514#discussion_r38613656
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -315,6 +309,14 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7127
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8514#issuecomment-137333652
Merged into master, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7127#issuecomment-13790
I've merged this into master after applying the change myself
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7927#issuecomment-137333165
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7927#issuecomment-137333173
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-137333035
Alright, merging into master. I fixed the test name on merge. Thanks
everyone.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7927#issuecomment-137332857
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7979#issuecomment-137332182
[Test build #41959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41959/consoleFull)
for PR 7979 at commit
[`28a34b8`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8482#issuecomment-137332208
Can you close this now that you've opened another one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7979#issuecomment-137331644
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7979#issuecomment-137331611
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7979#discussion_r38612921
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/rest/RestSubmissionClient.scala ---
@@ -413,6 +412,15 @@ private[spark] object RestSubmissionClient {
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7979#discussion_r38612889
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/rest/RestSubmissionClient.scala ---
@@ -413,6 +412,15 @@ private[spark] object RestSubmissionClient {
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7979#issuecomment-137331334
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#discussion_r38612752
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -473,6 +473,282 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
assertDataStruc
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#discussion_r38612691
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -473,6 +473,282 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
assertDataStruc
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38612598
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +134,32 @@ private[spark] abstract class YarnSch
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38612546
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +94,36 @@ private[spark] abstract class YarnSched
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-137328959
[Test build #41958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41958/consoleFull)
for PR 8383 at commit
[`62cc7e3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-137328168
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-137328114
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-137327156
@davies Thanks for comment and continuing this patch. I still added new
commits to fix the problems you mentioned. But free feel to merge #8579 when it
is ready. I will c
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8567#issuecomment-137327087
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-137326904
@mccheah Overall this looks pretty good. I think throughout the patch there
are still quite a few places where the change is not intended / no longer
necessary. Other
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8567
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8578
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8578#issuecomment-137323772
LGTM, merging this into master 1.5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8575#discussion_r38611491
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JdbcDialects.scala ---
@@ -240,3 +242,21 @@ case object DB2Dialect extends JdbcDialect {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8578#issuecomment-137323307
[Test build #1716 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1716/console)
for PR 8578 at commit
[`2905fd5`](https://github
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8580#issuecomment-137323237
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8580#issuecomment-137323239
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8580#issuecomment-137323181
[Test build #41953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41953/console)
for PR 8580 at commit
[`f7e5b00`](https://github.
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8155#issuecomment-137322854
Will do it tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8570#issuecomment-137322164
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8570#issuecomment-137322163
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8570#issuecomment-137322099
[Test build #41957 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41957/console)
for PR 8570 at commit
[`9978206`](https://github.
Github user vinodkc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8507#issuecomment-137312813
@feynmanliang , fixed your review comments. Could you please verify it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8578#issuecomment-137311709
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8578#issuecomment-137311710
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8578#issuecomment-137311641
[Test build #41952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41952/console)
for PR 8578 at commit
[`2905fd5`](https://github.
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#issuecomment-137310991
@Sephiroth-Lin there are two changes in your patch: using
`BroadcastNestedLoopJoin` for the small table, and putting the small table in
the left side of `RDD.cartesian`.
Github user vinodkc commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8565#discussion_r38609166
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -278,7 +278,8 @@ class DenseMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
}
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#discussion_r38608917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/CartesianProduct.scala
---
@@ -27,16 +27,27 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.{
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-137307153
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-137307149
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-137306559
[Test build #41951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41951/console)
for PR 5636 at commit
[`5bb1ae6`](https://github.
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38608268
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -474,18 +509,26 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38608264
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -474,18 +509,26 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
c
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38608220
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -236,10 +246,14 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
if (co
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38608209
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -211,8 +218,11 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
* Deal w
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38608149
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -474,18 +509,26 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38608061
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -474,18 +509,26 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38608057
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -474,18 +509,26 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607895
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -440,22 +454,43 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
//
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607757
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +94,36 @@ private[spark] abstract class YarnSchedule
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8580#issuecomment-137302069
I'll merge tomorrow morning unless someone chimes in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607674
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -440,22 +454,43 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
//
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607588
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -440,22 +454,43 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
//
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607562
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +134,32 @@ private[spark] abstract class YarnSchedu
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607365
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -440,22 +454,43 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
//
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607396
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -440,22 +454,43 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
//
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607225
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607194
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -67,6 +68,11 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38607202
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -64,7 +66,7 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
securityMg
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8580#issuecomment-137300659
Do you want to merge it since I don't have commit bits then? (or wait for
srowen to take a look too?)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8578#issuecomment-137300609
[Test build #1716 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1716/consoleFull)
for PR 8578 at commit
[`2905fd5`](https://git
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8580#issuecomment-137300560
Makes sense
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8580#issuecomment-137299432
I wouldn't hold the release for it, but we can definitely push it to
branch-1.5. Worst case, it makes it to 1.5.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38606027
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +134,32 @@ private[spark] abstract class YarnSch
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r38605954
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +94,36 @@ private[spark] abstract class YarnSched
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-137297486
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-137297480
[Test build #41956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41956/console)
for PR 8007 at commit
[`e967fa4`](https://github.
1 - 100 of 656 matches
Mail list logo
