Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8864#discussion_r40490758
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -946,15 +946,36 @@ setMethod("foreachPartition",
## SELECT ###
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8913#issuecomment-143403274
@NarineK Could you close this PR for now ? As we discussed on the JIRA we
can get back to this after SPARK-9317 has been resolved.
(Also FYI because of the way our
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8869#discussion_r40490731
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrameStatFunctions.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143400329
[Test build #43047 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43047/consoleFull)
for PR 8758 at commit
[`507a5c5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143400137
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143400142
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143400127
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143400118
The error is not related to this pull
```
[error] SERVER ERROR: Service Temporarily Unavailable
url=http://maven.twttr.com/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-yarn-server
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8903
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8903#issuecomment-143398042
@cloud-fan You are right. This patch still can't eliminate the extra
conversion. Close it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143394194
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143394187
[Test build #43046 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43046/console)
for PR 8758 at commit
[`507a5c5`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143394193
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#issuecomment-143393417
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#issuecomment-143393416
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#issuecomment-143393395
[Test build #43035 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43035/console)
for PR 8911 at commit
[`d9ca925`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#issuecomment-143393161
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#issuecomment-143393162
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#issuecomment-143393139
[Test build #43041 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43041/console)
for PR 7052 at commit
[`c0a1766`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143392358
[Test build #43046 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43046/consoleFull)
for PR 8758 at commit
[`507a5c5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143392156
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143392148
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143392105
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143392038
[Test build #43045 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43045/console)
for PR 8758 at commit
[`507a5c5`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143392104
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391795
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391790
Fail msg not related to pull
```
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391651
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391650
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391457
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391456
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391399
[Test build #43045 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43045/consoleFull)
for PR 8758 at commit
[`507a5c5`](https://gith
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391340
Thanks @srowen for excellent and quick review comments. updated.thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8879#issuecomment-143391289
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8879#issuecomment-143391291
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391252
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391255
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8879#issuecomment-143391253
[Test build #43037 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43037/console)
for PR 8879 at commit
[`8a3c124`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391051
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8921#issuecomment-143391044
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143391045
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user xiaowen147 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8921
[SPARK-10839] Changing the priority of SPARK_DAEMON_MEMORY, when start
thriftserver
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10839
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by run
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143390769
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8758#issuecomment-143390772
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8910#issuecomment-143387790
Looks like some other patches introduce this mima failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-143385903
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-143385900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-143385617
[Test build #43039 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43039/console)
for PR 8564 at commit
[`f8758a0`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8619#issuecomment-143385392
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8619#issuecomment-143385390
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8619#issuecomment-143385321
[Test build #43038 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43038/console)
for PR 8619 at commit
[`6866a2a`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8910#issuecomment-143385173
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8910#issuecomment-143385172
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8910#issuecomment-143385108
[Test build #43042 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43042/console)
for PR 8910 at commit
[`0e54fb1`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8505#issuecomment-143383961
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8910#issuecomment-143383946
[Test build #43042 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43042/consoleFull)
for PR 8910 at commit
[`0e54fb1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8505#issuecomment-143383960
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8505#issuecomment-143383944
[Test build #43040 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43040/console)
for PR 8505 at commit
[`aaa2376`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8910#issuecomment-143383873
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8910#issuecomment-143383860
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8910#issuecomment-143383838
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8889#issuecomment-143383597
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8889#issuecomment-143383583
[Test build #43036 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43036/console)
for PR 8889 at commit
[`8fb386a`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8889#issuecomment-143383598
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8505#issuecomment-143381217
[Test build #43040 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43040/consoleFull)
for PR 8505 at commit
[`aaa2376`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#issuecomment-143381262
[Test build #43035 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43035/consoleFull)
for PR 8911 at commit
[`d9ca925`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8879#issuecomment-143381218
[Test build #43037 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43037/consoleFull)
for PR 8879 at commit
[`8a3c124`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-143381161
[Test build #43039 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43039/consoleFull)
for PR 8564 at commit
[`f8758a0`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8889#issuecomment-143381186
[Test build #43036 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43036/consoleFull)
for PR 8889 at commit
[`8fb386a`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#issuecomment-143381154
[Test build #43041 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43041/consoleFull)
for PR 7052 at commit
[`c0a1766`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8619#issuecomment-143380807
[Test build #43038 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43038/consoleFull)
for PR 8619 at commit
[`6866a2a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#issuecomment-143380514
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8619#issuecomment-143380516
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-143380518
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8879#issuecomment-143380517
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#issuecomment-143380519
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8505#issuecomment-143380513
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8889#issuecomment-143380515
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jayluan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-143379925
Jira ticket created at
[SPARK-10821](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10821)
Toy test case to recreate the problem as follows. I can't seem to attach
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#issuecomment-143379507
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8920#issuecomment-143379540
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8564#issuecomment-143379501
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8889#issuecomment-143379490
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8505#issuecomment-143379506
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8619#issuecomment-143379496
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8879#issuecomment-143379494
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#issuecomment-143379488
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user NarineK opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8920
[SPARK-10836] [SparkR] Added sort(x, decreasing, col, ... ) method to
DataFrame
the sort function can be used as an alternative to arrange(... ).
As arguments it accepts x - dataframe, decreasin
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786#discussion_r40485255
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#discussion_r40485077
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite.scala
---
@@ -233,4 +234,12 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite extends Spar
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#issuecomment-143374415
LGTM aside from two minor things.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#discussion_r40484476
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite.scala
---
@@ -233,4 +234,12 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtilSuite extends Spar
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8911#discussion_r40484368
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1757,6 +1757,8 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with Executor
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786#discussion_r40484168
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -449,6 +458,13 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedulerBack
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786#discussion_r40484126
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786#discussion_r40484088
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786#discussion_r40484064
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786#discussion_r40483975
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -449,6 +458,13 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedulerBack
Github user rerngvit commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8882#discussion_r40483611
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -140,7 +140,11 @@ class CrossValidator(override val uid: String) extend
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-143360758
What if we write our own version of ObjectOutputStream with weak references
instead of using strong references ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
1 - 100 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
