Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74848/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17186
ping @sameeragarwal This is updated according to your previous comment. Can
you help review this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
[SPARK-20024] [SQL] SessionCatalog API setCurrentDatabase need to set the
current database of ExternalCatalog [WIP]
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SessionCatalog API se
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
ping @cloud-fan @hvanhovell Can you help review this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74844/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #74844 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74844/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
[`a1f9327`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r106833748
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/MedianHeap.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r106833737
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/MedianHeap.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r106833868
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/MedianHeap.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17297
> when the stage fails because of fetch failure, we remove the stage from
the output commiter. So if any task completes between the time of first fetch
failure and the time stage is resubmitted, will
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74840/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
**[Test build #74849 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74849/testReport)**
for PR 17293 at commit
[`eafc386`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74840 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74840/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`0a05bfa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74848/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`d5740d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74847 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74847/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
[`891813f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/89
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74838/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74838 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74838/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`fdc9d2a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
**[Test build #74846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74846/testReport)**
for PR 17274 at commit
[`3292da7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/32
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74837/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74837 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74837/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
[`b1125fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
I might knew the root cause of the remaining two failures. : ) When we call
`setCurrentDatabase`, the current database of the Hive client is not reset. Let
me try it.
---
If your project is se
Github user jianran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17334
@SparkQA why I changed exception msg causes the test failed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user ioana-delaney commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
That's a good idea, thanks @CodingCat .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74836/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335#discussion_r106831705
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -353,6 +354,25 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74836 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74836/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`a02d3d6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74842/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74842 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74842/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
[`891813f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
**[Test build #74845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74845/testReport)**
for PR 17353 at commit
[`7598eb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/75
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74835/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
**[Test build #74835 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74835/testReport)**
for PR 17331 at commit
[`e4c41dc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
cc @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user wzhfy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
[SPARK-17080][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Improve documentation and naming for
methods/variables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve documentation and naming for methods/variables
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
It sounds like it is not related to
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290. Without the changes, we still can
pass it after trigging another retest. Let us focus on the remaining failure.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
Without code changes,
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74836/ still
can pass after triggering a retest. I think it is not related to this PR.
---
If your proje
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Yeah, I can support for getting this into 2.2 if others are busy. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #74844 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74844/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
[`a1f9327`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
**[Test build #74843 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74843/testReport)**
for PR 17141 at commit
[`02d44aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/02
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
ah...somehow I missed this email.
I like this idea, the comments here would be that `if the last screenshot
is the latest design, will the user have to sum up the total amount of used
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286
@ioana-delaney Thanks for the replies.
> Given A J1 B J2 C: - case 1
⢠level 0: (A), (B), (C)
⢠level 1: {A, B}, ~~{A, C}~~, {B, C}
⢠level 3: {A, B, C}
Given A J1 B J2
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335#discussion_r106828435
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -353,6 +354,25 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
}
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17352
@felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user ioana-delaney commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
@gatorsmile @cloud-fan I rewrote the test cases to align to the join
reorder suite. Please take a look. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106828049
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.catal
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74841/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
**[Test build #74841 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74841/testReport)**
for PR 17141 at commit
[`1ddb82e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
**[Test build #74841 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74841/testReport)**
for PR 17141 at commit
[`1ddb82e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17352
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74839/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17352
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74842 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74842/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
[`891813f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/89
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17352
**[Test build #74839 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74839/testReport)**
for PR 17352 at commit
[`965dce3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
@gatorsmile I have merge this pr with master and revert #17290, and
waiting for the jenkins to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74840 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74840/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`0a05bfa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0a
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
Thanks @squito , finally get someone's attention :). I will update the code
soon.
Before this change off-heap on on-heap memory are added together
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17352
**[Test build #74839 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74839/testReport)**
for PR 17352 at commit
[`965dce3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/96
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17352
Miss backslash in python code
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add backslash for line continuation in python code.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkin
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
@hhbyyh I think I misunderstood your comments in jira. I will update this
pr with the new plan: directly add `protected var storageLevel` in `Predictor`,
without adding setter and getter of it
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
ok, let me do it~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74838 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74838/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`fdc9d2a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fd
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Can you revert the changes made in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290? Then, we can see how many tests
still failed after the existing fixes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
After removing the changes in this PR, the test case passed in my local
environment. I think we need to revert it back.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74837 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74837/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
[`b1125fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b1
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
@gatorsmile we can find all the test failed here [maven test
result](https://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-2.7/2799)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74836 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74836/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`a02d3d6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a0
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
**[Test build #74835 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74835/testReport)**
for PR 17331 at commit
[`e4c41dc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e4
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
@zsxwing would you take a look at this? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
As found in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338, I am afraid this
one caused the following test failure.
- proactive block replication - 4 replicas - 3 block manager deletions ***
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
ok... It was stopped at Spark Core this time. Let me see which PR in Spark
Core was merged recently.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
@sethah Don't worry, I will update code ASAP and @yanboliang will also help
review it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74834/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74834 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74834/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`a02d3d6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74834 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74834/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`a02d3d6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a0
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Let us see which cases still failed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
Sorry, I did not realize we have such a JIRA. We just hit it in another PR
and simply fix it. Thanks!
Originally, I thought it was trivial, and thus I did not open a separate
JIRA.
--
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
@srowen I think #17344 was intended to be for a different JIRA and was
accidentally assigned the same JIRA# as this PR (although they are related
issues).
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
Also @gatorsmile don't forget to update the corresponding JIRA when you
merge a PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
It looks like this has the wrong JIRA id and should be SPARK-19988? I've
marked that jira as resolved by this PR, but let me know if I've misunderstood
things here.
---
If your project is s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74833/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74833 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74833/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
[`e33b50a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
@brkyvz A conference took up a lot of my time last week but I should have
it updated later today
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
I am merging this to master in the interest of time. If there are comments,
I will address them in a follow up PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
101 - 200 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
