Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216785573
**[Test build #57728 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57728/consoleFull)**
for PR 12870 at commit
[`7df46dc`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216786034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216786036
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-217337928
ping @jkbradley @dbtsai @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218772609
**[Test build #58489 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58489/consoleFull)**
for PR 12870 at commit
[`33afa2e`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218780795
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218780791
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218781050
i will retrigger this build once maintenance is over.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218809579
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218811379
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218812756
**[Test build #58500 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58500/consoleFull)**
for PR 12870 at commit
[`33afa2e`](https://gi
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218814640
@viirya Sorry for late response! The changes should be similar to
mllib-local. The scope is not moving UDTs but copying the entire linalg package
to `spark.ml`. We shoul
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218842209
**[Test build #58500 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58500/consoleFull)**
for PR 12870 at commit
[`33afa2e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218842533
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218842531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-218939778
@mengxr Currently I moved only Vector/Matrix and their UDTs to `pyspark.ml`
and made `pyspark.ml` and `pyspark.mllib` codes to use moved `ml.linalg`
Vector/Matrix. Besid
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-219007782
@mengxr @dbtsai Separating the pickle paths for `pyspark.ml` and
`pyspark.mllib` is not possible without the changes in #12627, as it requires
the Scala ML code changes
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-219008210
@mengxr @dbtsai That PR is at #13099.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-219583049
Ping @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
20 matches
Mail list logo