Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403#discussion_r205244503
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/negative-cases/subq-input-typecheck.sql.out
---
@@ -113,15 +105,7 @@ WHERE
struct<>
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21818
LGTM
Thanks! Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user Fokko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Feels like a flaky test in the `KafkaContinuousSinkSuite`. Lets rerun :-)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
**[Test build #93569 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93569/testReport)**
for PR 21596 at commit
[`e16f7a1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
**[Test build #93549 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93549/testReport)**
for PR 21451 at commit
[`fe31a7d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21818
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93549/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875
Can you add JDBC to the title?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21758#discussion_r205249297
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/BarrierTaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21758#discussion_r205249225
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/BarrierTaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21758#discussion_r205249449
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/BarrierTaskContext.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) un
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21758#discussion_r205249547
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/MapPartitionsRDD.scala
---
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ import org.apache.spark.{Partition, TaskContext}
private[s
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21758#discussion_r205250352
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1839,6 +1847,20 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
def toJavaRDD() : JavaRDD[T] = {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21758#discussion_r205250930
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ActiveJob.scala ---
@@ -60,4 +60,10 @@ private[spark] class ActiveJob(
val finished = Array.fill
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21758
What's the failure mode if there are not enough slots for the barrier mode?
We should throw an exception right?
---
-
To unsubscri
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21873#discussion_r205252848
--- Diff: scalastyle-config.xml ---
@@ -150,6 +150,19 @@ This file is divided into 3 sections:
// scalastyle:on println]]>
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21873
**[Test build #93552 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93552/testReport)**
for PR 21873 at commit
[`8b5ad70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21873
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21873
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93552/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user maryannxue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
@mgaido91 I see. But by using Seq[Expression] in `In`, can we hopefully
remove `ResolveInValues`. I wouldn't mind changing the parser if it's necessary
and if it saves work elsewhere. Having such
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r205255482
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,94 @@ object ExtractPythonUDFFromAggr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4
**[Test build #41 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/ubuntuSparkPRB/41/testReport)**
for PR 4 at commit
[`414d267`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/414d2673b31a72d8a9edb4f5d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
**[Test build #93570 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93570/testReport)**
for PR 21221 at commit
[`8905d23`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/89
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r205262719
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,94 @@ object ExtractPythonUDFFromAggre
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875#discussion_r205266067
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -172,7 +172,11 @@ private[sql] case class JD
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875#discussion_r205267327
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCOptions.scala
---
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ class JDBCOptions(
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r205267754
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,94 @@ object ExtractPythonUDFFromAggr
Github user TomaszGaweda commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875#discussion_r205267937
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -172,7 +172,11 @@ private[sql] case class
Github user TomaszGaweda commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875#discussion_r205268370
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCOptions.scala
---
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ class JDBCOptions(
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r205268767
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,94 @@ object ExtractPythonUDFFromAggre
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875#discussion_r205268701
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -172,7 +172,11 @@ private[sql] case class JD
Github user TomaszGaweda commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875#discussion_r205269684
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -172,7 +172,11 @@ private[sql] case class
Github user TomaszGaweda commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875#discussion_r205269695
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -172,7 +172,11 @@ private[sql] case class
GitHub user maryannxue opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21876
[SPARK-24802][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add a new config for Optimization Rule
Exclusion
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is an extension to the original PR, in which rule
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21876
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21876
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1329/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21876
**[Test build #93571 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93571/testReport)**
for PR 21876 at commit
[`3730053`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/37
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
fyi, I did finally run my scale tests again on a cluster, and shuffles,
remote reads, and replication worked for blocks over 2gb (sorry got sidetracked
with a few other things in the meantime)
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21821
**[Test build #93555 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93555/testReport)**
for PR 21821 at commit
[`ddbd9f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21821
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93555/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21821
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20414
**[Test build #93558 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93558/testReport)**
for PR 20414 at commit
[`6910ed6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20414
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93558/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20414
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320
> Few comments like #21320 (comment) or ^ are not minor or nits. I leave
hard -1 if they are not addressed.
I'm sorry to say I'm very close to hanging up this PR. I put a lot of care,
time
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20405
**[Test build #93559 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93559/testReport)**
for PR 20405 at commit
[`47bb245`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20405
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93559/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20405
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r205275406
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,94 @@ object ExtractPythonUDFFromAggr
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21868#discussion_r205278202
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -381,6 +381,26 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21868#discussion_r205278858
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -401,12 +399,41 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875
**[Test build #93562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93562/testReport)**
for PR 21875 at commit
[`a83b64b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93562/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
**[Test build #93557 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93557/testReport)**
for PR 21221 at commit
[`20799d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21875
@maryannxue We need to update the programming guide ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93557/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809
**[Test build #93563 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93563/testReport)**
for PR 21809 at commit
[`d57e6dc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21850
@gatorsmile All the new rules added into `If` should always have `CaseWhen`
version.
But there will be time that we only add `If` version, or it only makes
sense to have `If` version.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93563/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21850
**[Test build #93564 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93564/testReport)**
for PR 21850 at commit
[`e2b0e96`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21850
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93564/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21850
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user habren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21868#discussion_r205287123
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -381,6 +381,26 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21867
**[Test build #93566 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93566/testReport)**
for PR 21867 at commit
[`a5b00b8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21867
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93566/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21867
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user habren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21868#discussion_r205288000
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -401,12 +399,41 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
GitHub user rdblue opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
[SPARK-24923][SQL][WIP] Add unpartitioned CTAS and RTAS support for
DataSourceV2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Remove extends from `ReadSupport` and `WriteSupport` c
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21857#discussion_r205289050
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1275,6 +1276,64 @@ object ReplaceExceptWithAntiJo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1330/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
**[Test build #93572 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93572/testReport)**
for PR 21877 at commit
[`d308d3c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d3
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
@cloud-fan, @gatorsmile, @marmbrus, this PR demonstrates how plans would
use the catalog changes introduced in #21306. To see the changes, you may want
to look at just the last commit because this in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
**[Test build #93572 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93572/testReport)**
for PR 21877 at commit
[`d308d3c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93572/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21857
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1331/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21857
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21857
**[Test build #93573 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93573/testReport)**
for PR 21857 at commit
[`b201b88`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b2
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21867
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21867
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1332/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21867
**[Test build #93574 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93574/testReport)**
for PR 21867 at commit
[`a5b00b8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
**[Test build #93568 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93568/testReport)**
for PR 21306 at commit
[`0ee938b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93568/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21878
[SPARK-24924][SQL] Add mapping for built-in Avro data source
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to the followings.
1. Like `com.databricks.spark.csv`
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21878
cc @gengliangwang and @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comman
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21878
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1333/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21878
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21878
**[Test build #93575 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93575/testReport)**
for PR 21878 at commit
[`d95ba40`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d9
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21821
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19528
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user wangyum closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21871
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21852
**[Test build #93576 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93576/testReport)**
for PR 21852 at commit
[`0b67e2e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0b
301 - 400 of 506 matches
Mail list logo
