Hello,
While porting the library to linux kernel space I discovered multiple
ceil function calls with integer value as argument.
I'm not really sure if it's a redundant call and not a bug.
My intention is to get rid of floating-point expressions because linux
kernel does not support it.
remove_c
Hello,
It's impossible to load current rohc libaries from python (using
ctypes) without explicit dependencies.
'comp' library depends on 'common', 'decomp' library depends on
'common' and 'comp'.
fix_libdep.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Mailing li
2012/6/20 Didier Barvaux :
> Linux kernel support would a great thing. There is Launchpad blueprint
> on this subject [2]. Is it planned to make the modifications public?
Yes, take a look at kernel_module.patch.
It allows to build rohc library as linux kernel module. The main issue
here is lack o
> I'm curious. What's the problem with the name "rohc.c"?
Kbuild system does not allow to create module with 'rohc' name from
_multiple_ object files when one of them has the same name. (It does
in case of single-source module, thought.) I rename rohc.c to
rohc_common.c in the link farm. You could
Question #212291 on rohc changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/rohc/+question/212291
Status: Open => Answered
Mikhail Gruzdev proposed the following answer:
Hi,
try to add rohc_comp, rohc_decomp, rohc_common at 'C/C++
Build'-->'Settings'->'GCC C Linker
Hi!
I've played with revision 702 today.
Kernel modules install/uninstall is broken, the off-tree build fails
to build and there is no clean/distclean targets for modules at all
:) . My initial patch addressed this features just fine.
The other thing I've noticed is that rohc_test throws multip
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Didier Barvaux wrote:
>
> I didn't see them. What kernel version did you used?
It's 3.2.0-23-generic-pae from ubuntu-12.04-desktop-i386 distribution.
I've uploaded kernel and userspace message logs:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7kwArZeP9zXV256SjBabUY0TmM/edi
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:46 PM, manish shivare
wrote:
> $ make install
Hi. Install should be run by root user (for default DESTDIR). Try
'sudo make install' .
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~rohc
Post to : rohc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscr
Question #224977 on rohc changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/rohc/+question/224977
Status: Open => Answered
Mikhail Gruzdev proposed the following answer:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:46 PM, manish shivare
wrote:
> $ make install
Hi. Install should be run by root user (for default D
Question #399335 on rohc changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/rohc/+question/399335
Status: Open => Answered
Mikhail Gruzdev proposed the following answer:
Hi,
Something goes wrong with kernel module build. If you don't need it
then just rerun configure without '--enable
The library uses 64-bit division. Apparently, compatibility with
32-bit cpu is broken for now.
AFAICS offending functions are is_sn_wraparound and
rohc_comp_periodic_down_transition.
On 12/12/17, Yakir Matusovsky wrote:
> Hey,
>
>
>
> Building rohc 2.1.0 for armv7 with TI SDK linux kernel 4.4.32
Hi!
I've just created a pull request for the same issue
https://github.com/didier-barvaux/rohc/pull/4 .
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~rohc
Post to : rohc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~rohc
More help : https://h
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Didier Barvaux wrote:
> I prefer not to embed the do_div implementation in the library
Ok, closed. The second one addressed those kernel-level test issues.
Take a look: https://github.com/didier-barvaux/rohc/pull/5 .
___
Question #707783 on rohc changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/rohc/+question/707783
Status: Open => Answered
Mikhail Gruzdev proposed the following answer:
shujingwang,
Just remove EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rohc_buf_*); lines from linux/kmod.c .
On 8/30/23, shujingwang wrote:
> New qu
14 matches
Mail list logo