[Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 --- Comment #51 from Miro Hrončok --- Thanks spot. Once we figure it out, we can rename the main package in rpmfuison to chromium-freeworld for sure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug._

[Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 --- Comment #50 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- The %files change is invalid for the reason that Nicolas points out, but I'll apply the naming one in the 60 build I'm working on now. I'll also test build the freeworld package for sanity, but I need

[Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 --- Comment #49 from Miro Hrončok --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #48) > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #47) > > (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #46) > > > The builds are failing: > > > > > > http://koji.rpmfusion.

[Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 --- Comment #48 from Miro Hrončok --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #47) > (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #46) > > The builds are failing: > > > > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151088 > > http://koji.rpmfus

[Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 --- Comment #47 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #46) > The builds are failing: > > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151088 > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151158 > http://koji.rpmf

[Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 --- Comment #46 from Miro Hrončok --- The builds are failing: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151088 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151158 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151369 Nevertheless there

[Bug 4612] Review Request: libtgvoip - VoIP library for Telegram clients

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4612 --- Comment #7 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- > Why does this qualify for rpmfusion repo? Libtgvoip requires part of webrtc project - patented echo cancellation algorithms. Without it it will be useless. webrtc-audio-processing package available in F

[Bug 4612] Review Request: libtgvoip - VoIP library for Telegram clients

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4612 --- Comment #6 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- libtgvoip is free too. License: Public Domain. Repository: https://github.com/grishka/libtgvoip -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug._

[Bug 4612] Review Request: libtgvoip - VoIP library for Telegram clients

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4612 --- Comment #5 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- > Are they free or nonfree? It's free. License: BSD. Official site: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/pulseaudio/webrtc-audio-processing/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 4612] Review Request: libtgvoip - VoIP library for Telegram clients

2017-08-02 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4612 --- Comment #4 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #3) > (In reply to leigh scott from comment #2) > > Why does this qualify for rpmfusion repo? > > Because it has bundled webrtc with patented technologies. It can't be