https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5020
FeRD (Frank Dana) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ferd...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
I seem to be having a problem getting my replies to go through.
As far as I know I did indeed execute `rfpkg new-sources` for each branch prior
to building.
My apologies if the el7 branch is not like the others. They should all be the
same.
I have gone ahead and reissued an `rfpkg new-sources`
Going to try this one more time...
I know that Nicolas wasn't in favor but I don't want to choose what version
of Unifi[1] someone has to run based on their choice of Fedora or EPEL.
There are cases where someone on CentOS 7 may want to have the latest and
greatest or someone running Fedora may
Hi Sérgio,
I thought I did indeed issue an rfpkg new-sources for all branches. They should
all be the same in terms of source tarballs and specfile. My apologies if they
are not.
In an attempt to correct this, I just reissued `rfpkg new-sources` then pushed
the changes. Please let me know if
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5020
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5021
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5022
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5020
Bug ID: 5020
Summary: Review Request: wireguard - Fast, modern, secure VPN
tunnel
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5022
Bug ID: 5022
Summary: Review Request: wireguard - Fast, modern, secure VPN
tunnel
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5021
Bug ID: 5021
Summary: Review Request: wireguard-kmod - Kernel module (kmod)
for Wireguard
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 14:43:03 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to orphan qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld, along with the Fedora
> qt5-qtwebengine package. Please see:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg247677.html
> for the full story.
>
> I think it would be best if it were
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5015
--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande ---
Ready to go on.
SPEC file: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/ppsspp/ppsspp.spec
SRPM file:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/ppsspp/ppsspp-1.6.3-4.20180912git6d0ed4a.fc28.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 02:04 +0200, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> commit bf774f2aaad95f9f75c3a18b69642f9740c2d59b
> Author: Andrew Bauer
> Date: Wed Sep 12 19:03:40 2018 -0500
>
> zoneminder 1.32.0 release
>
> cakephp-enum-behavior-1.0-zm.tar.gz | Bin 0 -> 3509 bytes
> crud-3.1.0-zm.tar.gz
Andrew,
we should try, please, use git merge with fast forward , typically :
rfpkg ci -c && git show
rfpkg push && rfpkg build --nowait
git checkout f29 && git merge master && git push && rfpkg build --nowait; git
checkout master
git checkout f28 && git merge master && git push && rfpkg
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993
--- Comment #40 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Akarshan Biswas from comment #39)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #38)
>
> > Tom's reply: "that there is no clear way to do it"
>
> Hmm. Then I think we have no choice.
> I have
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993
--- Comment #39 from Akarshan Biswas ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #38)
> Tom's reply: "that there is no clear way to do it"
Hmm. Then I think we have no choice.
I have made some changes to the spec file
TLDR; I hadn't time to look at this , maybe next week , have you
checked [1] my work in progress ?
Best regards,
[1]https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/sergiomb/rpms/sip/commits/masterh
ttps://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/sergiomb/rpms/python-
qt5/commits/master
On Sat, 2018-09-08 at 13:25 -0400,
17 matches
Mail list logo
