http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
Xavier Lamien changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |lxt...@gmail.com
|rev.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #2 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-01-02
15:29:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=67)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=67)
Small improvements for VirtualBox-OSE-kmod.spec
Just a few notes (I just wanted to look at
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2009-01-02 17:17:14
---
* For the first thing, this stuff apparently wants a 32-bit toolchain on
x86_64. That sucks. x86_64 packages should be really x86_64, not mixed 32/64
bits. What 32-bit stuff is this tr
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-11 13:36:33 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=67)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=67) [details]
> Small improvements for VirtualBox-OSE-kmod.spec
>
> Jus
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
Thorsten Leemhuis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@leemhuis.info
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-24 19:11:41 ---
Updated to 2.1.2. No big changes in SPEC file apart from version bump. It needs
newer kBuild though; it's already built and submitted into Fedora testing.
Main package:
SPEC: http:/
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #7 from Xavier Lamien 2009-01-25 11:12:04 ---
Excellent, let me check that one too.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #8 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-01-27
09:17:45 ---
When rebuilding VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.2-1.el5.src.rpm on F10 x86_64:
> + ./configure --disable-kmods --with-gcc-compat=gcc34 --disable-qt3
> Unrecognized option "--with-gcc-compat=g
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@greysector.net
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-05 14:53:01 ---
Main package:
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/VirtualBox-OSE.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.2-2.el5.src.rpm
Kernel module (remains the same):
SPEC:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #11 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-02-07
10:59:40 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.2-2.el5.src.rpm
fails in mock x86-64 on and for F10 here:
+ ./configure --disable-kmods --disa
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #12 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-02-07
11:51:30 ---
Hmmm, VirtualBox-OSE-kmodsrc contains a lot of files; akmod users will all have
them on the disk and it make the metadata bigger.
Not sure, but it thus might be wiser to put the
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-03-14 20:59:39 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.2-2.el5.src.rpm
>
> fails in mock x86-64 on and for F10 here:
>
> +
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
liangsuilong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liangsuil...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #15 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-03-23 15:12:57 ---
Ping.
Anyone to do a full review?
Xavier?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #16 from Xavier Lamien 2009-03-28 12:54:11 ---
working this wk on.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #17 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-03-30 17:23:20 ---
Main package:
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/VirtualBox-OSE.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-2.fc11.src.rpm
Kernel module (stays the same):
SPEC: h
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #18 from Xavier Lamien 2009-04-06 00:15:15 ---
hmm... I've got a couple of error which need fixes.
VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 :
36 unstripped-binary-or-object (easy fix)
26 rpath issues
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #19 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-06 00:35:48 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> hmm... I've got a couple of error which need fixes.
>
> VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 :
>
> 36 unstripped-binary-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opensou...@till.name
--- Comment #20 from
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #21 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-12 18:35:33 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> > 26 rpath issues (you'll need to check kbuild files)
>
> I was under impression rpaths are used here (and we are not having only the
> standard rpaths),
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #22 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-16 15:06:07
---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > > 26 rpath issues (you'll need to check kbuild files)
> >
> > I was under impression rpaths are used here (and we are not
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #23 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-16
15:25:27 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Why not remove rpath and add custom search path into /etc/ld.so.conf.d?
Why should that be worth the work here?
And which of the two solutions is m
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #24 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-16 23:25:40
---
(In reply to comment #23)
> (In reply to comment #22)
> > Why not remove rpath and add custom search path into /etc/ld.so.conf.d?
>
> Why should that be worth the work here?
Beca
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #25 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-17 15:41:32
---
> Because guidelines strictly forbid the usage of rpath.
Yet there isn't really a better solution for libraries in nonstandard
directories and AFAIK there are already packages using
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
Xavier Lamien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||4
--- Comment #26 from Xavier Lamien
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #27 from Lubomir Rint
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #28 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-21 06:47:30 ---
Thanks for the review Xavier
Package CVS request
==
Package Name: VirtualBox-OSE
Short Description: - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware
Owners:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
Thorsten Leemhuis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|33 |
--- Comment #29 from Thorsten Le
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #30 from Xavier Lamien 2009-04-21 11:08:16 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Owners: lkundrak, laxathom
> * each package can only have one owner; I assume it's you and added laxathom
> as
> InitialCC
Added second owner.
--
Con
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #31 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-21
11:26:44 ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #28)
> > Owners: lkundrak, laxathom
> > * each package can only have one owner; I assume it's you and added
> > laxathom as
> >
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #33 from Xavier Lamien 2009-04-21 12:48:51 ---
Can i have a look on that script ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the C
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #34 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-21
13:01:36 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Can i have a look on that script ?
mschwendt reads the list, but asking him directly for it might be best and
safest
--
Configure bugmail: http://
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #32 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-21 11:40:22 ---
Imported and built for Raw Hide.
F-10 is pending the stable kBuild update.
Will upgrade to 2.2 this weekend.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #35 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-21
15:23:06 ---
@lkundrak, VirtualBox-OSE.spec contains
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64
that makes Plague build the package for athlon and several other "x86-archs";
see
http://buildsys.rpmfus
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #36 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-24 22:30:38 ---
(In reply to comment #35)
Done. Thanks for pointing that out.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail beca
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
37 matches
Mail list logo
