I am in the process of writing a script on some testing machines and I am
wondering if having it perform a dry run and itemized the items if it would
provide a list of differences such as file size and name etc conflicts
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
ut the --dry-run and
> why it would have done it. But it can't guarantee that nothing will
> change between the dry run and the real run. Of course if your source
> is a snapshotted filesystem that won't matter.
>
> On 08/01/13 01:59, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > I am
he right word but it is a list
> of differences. I wouldn't bother with the snapshot unless you are
> going to process the list and then do the real sync.
>
> On 08/01/13 02:10, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > I was thinking of using an lvm snapshot. all i really need is just
&
gt; On 08/01/13 02:18, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > At this point im debating if rsync is the right tool. I am trying
> > to determine if lsyncd which is based on rsync would do the trick.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Kevin Korb > <mailto:k...@sanit
g 1, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> If you are just looking for a list of what is different then yes.
>
> On 08/01/13 02:21, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > so Rsync would be a better solution in this case?
> >
&g
itemize-changes
> - --dry-run and probably not much else.
>
> On 08/01/13 02:24, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > this is what im getting currently as a test im running
> >
> > cd+ syncDir/
> >> f+ syncDir/rsync-3.0.6-1.aix5.3.ppc.rpm f+
> &g
you want.
>
> the rest is pretty much what I said I just spelled them out so they
> would be easier to lookup. You can also add a --delete if you want to
> see what is missing the dry run prevents it from actually deleting
> anything.
>
> On 08/01/13 02:32, Jonathan Aquilina wr
s is on an AIX 6.1 system installed from the aix toolbox package.
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
the link-dest?
>
> If it is the target try sending a mkdir first.
>
> On 09/04/13 09:56, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > I have the following script that I am working on
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> >
> > date=$(date +%F--%T)
> >
> > #ssh parameters user=aq
,
>
> ssh $user@$remotehost ln -sf $remotedir /home/aquj001/recievingDir.current
>
> On 09/05/13 00:54, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > Hey Kevin
> >
> > The path works as it is after i recreated the .current directory
> > but im still having the issue of a directory on
How would i need to create the sym link and to what?
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> No, it is linking the new target to the previous link-dest
>
> On 09/05/13 01:02, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> >
, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The .current symlink is a pointer to the current backup. It should
> always be from the backup you just made to the fixed location of the
> path you are using readlink on.
>
> On 09/05/13 01:04,
ile names. So, you make a sorted list then delete however
> many you have that are more than the number of them you want starting
> with the oldest. The current symlink is only pointing to the newest
> so it would only matter in the deletions if you are deleting all of
> the backups.
&
The current pointer being the recieveDir.current correct?
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The backup you just made to the current pointer you will readlink on
> the next run.
>
> On 09/05/13 01:36, Jo
What will happen if the first directory which is the oldest gets deleted
wouldnt i have to re link the next directory with the .current one?
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yes.
>
> On 09/05/13 01:38,
or it will give you a functioning example
> of this backup concept to look at and decide if you want to do it
> differently.
>
> On 09/05/13 17:44, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > After sym linking I am still having no luck
> >
> > rsync: change_dir#4
> > "/home/
After sym linking I am still having no luck
rsync: change_dir#4 "/home/aquj001/recievingDir.2013-09-05--23:40:58"
failed: No such file or directory (2)
rsync error: errors selecting input/output files, dirs (code 3) at
main.c(877) [receiver=3.0.6]
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (9 bytes rec
Not trying to derail the tread here, but if you all like I can help you guys
out in someway with testing on mac 10.8.5 if you like?
On Sunday 27 October 2013 11:17:19 Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Anthony Morton wrote:
> > However, attempting to build the new 3.1.0 rele
xit(0)
>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>> real 2833m1.324s user 2225m55.906s sys 45m10.015s
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Number of files: 11 Number of files transferred: 6
>>>>>>>>> Total file size: 126
sts.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
One thing you that im not seeing factored in is rpm speed of the drives.
On 26 Jul 2014 15:05, "L. A. Walsh" wrote:
> Adam Edgar wrote:
>
>> It seems the issue is indeed in the ssh layer. scp has the same issue and
>> some work has been done in “fixing” that:
>>
>> http://www.psc.edu/index.php/hp
posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
22 matches
Mail list logo
