Once upon a time, Wayne Davison said:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Hmm, I've applied this patch on both sides, but I'm still getting the
> > same error.
>
> The errors should go away on the next run
No, the errors went away when I actually used the patched rsync on
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Hmm, I've applied this patch on both sides, but I'm still getting the
> same error.
>
The errors should go away on the next run, since rsync should have set u+rwx
on the dirs during the most recent run (but it doesn't do it soon enough to
avo
Once upon a time, Matt McCutchen said:
> ---
> generator.c |7 +--
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Hmm, I've applied this patch on both sides, but I'm still getting the
same error. Is this because I'm using fake-super only on one side?
# rsync -v -axH --delete --rsyn
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> diff --git a/generator.c b/generator.c
>
Much appreciated. Applied and tested.
..wayne..
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listi
---
generator.c |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/generator.c b/generator.c
index 8038feb..4abe6a0 100644
--- a/generator.c
+++ b/generator.c
@@ -1892,6 +1892,7 @@ static void touch_up_dirs(struct file_list *flist, int
ndx)
static int counter =
