easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-17 Thread Vincent Yonemitsu
With the --backup and --backup-dir options that means that it copies out the files that are going to be changed before overwriting them to the specified directory? Vincent YonemitsuInformation Technology Services(905)639-3611 ext 153[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe or change options: htt

Re: easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-18 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:08:59PM -0400, Vincent Yonemitsu wrote: > With the --backup and --backup-dir options that means that it copies > out the files that are going to be changed before overwriting them to > the specified directory? Yes. That gives you a hierarchy with just the old version of

Re: easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-18 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 18 May 2005, Wayne Davison wrote: > It can be better to do a --compare-dest or --link-dest > into a new (empty) hierarchy, as this gives you a hierarchy with either > (for --compare-dest) just the new version of changed files in it or (for > --link-dest) all the files with ide

Re: easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-18 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > What I've been wondering is whether --fuzzy will also work with > --link-dest, i.e. hard-link to files whose names are slightly > different but are the same for other purposes Fuzzy doesn't really do much with --link-dest at the mome

Re: easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-19 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 18 May 2005, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > > What I've been wondering is whether --fuzzy will also work with > > --link-dest, i.e. hard-link to files whose names are slightly > > different but are the same for other purposes > > Fuzz