Re: [rt-users] Does anyone else think the 3.6.1 UI is... less attractive... than 3.4.5?

2006-11-02 Thread Franz Georg Köhler
On Do, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:22:01 -0500, Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you using the 3.4-compat CSS or the 3.5 CSS? Hello, I was using the 3.5 css and switched to 4.3-compat after reading Dieter's article. My second point was probably due to a messed-up Display.html . So there remains o

Re: [rt-users] Does anyone else think the 3.6.1 UI is... less attractive... than 3.4.5?

2006-11-02 Thread Mathew
Are you using the 3.4-compat CSS or the 3.5 CSS? Franz Georg Köhler wrote: > On Mi, Okt 18, 2006 at 04:19:02 -0400, Lee Whalen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So after much putzing, I finally was able to get all my data from >> 3.4.5 over to 3.6.1, *and* fix the weird CSS issue (long story, not

Re: [rt-users] Does anyone else think the 3.6.1 UI is... less attractive... than 3.4.5?

2006-11-02 Thread Franz Georg Köhler
On Mi, Okt 18, 2006 at 04:19:02 -0400, Lee Whalen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So after much putzing, I finally was able to get all my data from > 3.4.5 over to 3.6.1, *and* fix the weird CSS issue (long story, not the > best method *at all*, but it worked) However, now that I'm able to log >

Re: [rt-users] Does anyone else think the 3.6.1 UI is... less attractive... than 3.4.5?

2006-10-18 Thread Luca Corti
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:27 -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote: > I prefer the new look, no complaints or 'ewww's from the users when > I installed the new version. OK, let me see... I'm going to switch to the 3.4-compat theme overnight. Let's see what kind of reactions users will have tomorrow. :

Re: [rt-users] Does anyone else think the 3.6.1 UI is... less attractive... than 3.4.5?

2006-10-18 Thread Bill
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:19:02 -0400 Lee Whalen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake: >So after much putzing, I finally was able to get all my data from > 3.4.5 over to 3.6.1, *and* fix the weird CSS issue (long story, not the > best method *at all*, but it worked) However, now that I'm able to log > i

Re: [rt-users] Does anyone else think the 3.6.1 UI is... less attractive... than 3.4.5?

2006-10-18 Thread Scott T. Hildreth
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 23:10 +0200, Luca Corti wrote: > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:19 -0400, Lee Whalen wrote: > > or could I not have gotten out of the woods yet on this CSS issue? Does > > anyone have any screenshots of a good working 3.6.1 install? > > Hello, > > I have not had any issue with

Re: [rt-users] Does anyone else think the 3.6.1 UI is... less attractive... than 3.4.5?

2006-10-18 Thread Luca Corti
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:19 -0400, Lee Whalen wrote: > or could I not have gotten out of the woods yet on this CSS issue? Does > anyone have any screenshots of a good working 3.6.1 install? Hello, I have not had any issue with the new appearence, but I think the new face of RT is sometimes not

RE: [rt-users] Does anyone else think the 3.6.1 UI is... less attractive... than 3.4.5?

2006-10-18 Thread Scott Golby
> into my shiny new 3.6.1 system and looking around, the look and feel is > *vastly* different from 3.4.5. Has anyone else had this same problem, I installed v3.6.1 recently and it worked fine, everything came up on the screen "OK" but ewww, I definitely did not like the new look. You can ch

Re: [rt-users] Does anyone else think the 3.6.1 UI is... less attractive... than 3.4.5?

2006-10-18 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 04:19:02PM -0400, Lee Whalen wrote: > So after much putzing, I finally was able to get all my data from > 3.4.5 over to 3.6.1, *and* fix the weird CSS issue (long story, not the > best method *at all*, but it worked) However, now that I'm able to log > into my shiny